The Physical and Morphological Properties of Kenaf Fibres/ Epoxy in Coating Treatment Process

Authors

  • Muhammad Mustakim Mohd Ghaztar
  • Nik Noor Idayu Nik Ibrahim
  • Sarani Zakaria
  • Ahmad Zafir Romli

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/srj.v16i2.5624

Keywords:

kenaf fibre, pulverisation process, epoxy coating treatment, post-cutting behaviour

Abstract

Natural fibre is known useful in many applications however, the existing fibre treatment method able to reduce its overall properties. In this study, a new, simple and cost-effective fibre coating treatment method was developed which was able to improve the physical and morphological properties that open a new path for natural based materials to be used in a more robust application. The physical and morphological properties of various coated kenaf fibres were analysed to comprehend the cutting behaviour of coated fibres after subjected to the pulverisation process. The kenaf fibres were individually immersed in 1:4, 1:5 and 1:6 epoxy to acetone coating solutions prior cured, and pulverised consecutively using 5 mm, 1 mm, 0.5 mm and 0.25 mm mesh sizes aperture. The morphological characteristic was analysed using polarised optical and scanning electron microscope. The result showed that 1:6 coating ratio solution able to effectively coat the fibres’ aspect ratio that forming individual coated fibre which in long length pulverised fibres. Moreover, the low viscous 1:6 solution able to penetrate inside fibre structure that supported by density and fibre crosssection analysis compare to the other solutions. In future, this analysis is crucial to give insight on the coated fibres behaviour after subjected to the mechanical means of cutting process that later relates to the reinforcing mechanism in the composite samples.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-18

How to Cite

Mohd Ghaztar , M. M. ., Nik Ibrahim, N. N. I. ., Zakaria, S., & Romli, A. Z. . (2019). The Physical and Morphological Properties of Kenaf Fibres/ Epoxy in Coating Treatment Process. Scientific Research Journal, 16(2), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.24191/srj.v16i2.5624