FREE TOOLS FOR PARAPHASING: TO USE OR NOT TO USE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/VoA.v19i2.11685Abstract
Paraphrasing is generally considered a challenging skill to acquire but it is a necessity in academic writing. With the advent of technology, a plethora of applications both free and premium are now available to authors looking for shortcuts. This article reports the findings of a small-scale study to assess a free paraphrasing tool, the QuillBot paraphraser and ChatGPT, the artificial intelligence assistant that can be used to paraphrase texts. A paragraph from Purdue Online Writing Lab was extracted to generate the paraphrases. Results indicate that QuillBot generally failed to paraphrase original texts appropriately as it basically substituted words with synonyms with few to no structural changes. Users of the tool would be considered as patchwriting or plagiarising although the original author was cited. Although ChatGPT was more impressive, it also had limitations such as providing incorrect citations and non-existent sources. Users should be aware of the pitfalls of relying on these free tools and instead write their own paraphrases to avoid the potential risk of committing academic dishonesty.
References
Ansorge, L., Ansorgeová, K., & Sixsmith, M. (2021). Plagiarism through paraphrasing tools—the story of one plagiarized text. Publications 9(4),48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9040048
Bailey, C., & Withers, J. (2018). What can screen capture reveal about students’ use of software tools when undertaking a paraphrasing task? Journal of Academic Writing, 8(2), 176-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.18552/joaw.456
Bowen, N. E. A. J., & Nanni, A. (2021) Piracy, playing the system, or poor policies? Perspectives on plagiarism in Thailand. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 51. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jeap. 2021. 100992
Brown, S. J., & Hammond, K. (2022). Plagiarism in higher education: Navigating a perfect storm. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 33(5), 100-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.5.452
Chandere, V., Satish, S., & Lakshminarayanan, R. (2021). Online plagiarism detection tools in the digital age: A review. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 7110-7119.
Chen, M. H., Huang, S. T., Chang, J. S., & Liou, H. C. (2015). Developing a corpus-based paraphrase tool to improve EFL learners’ writing skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning 28(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.783873
Citation Project. (n.d.). What is (and isn’t) Plagiarism? http://www.citationproject.net/plagiarism/
Cumming, A., Lai, C., & Cho, H. (2016). Students' writing from sources for academic purposes: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 47-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.06.002
de Winter, J. C. F. (2023). Can ChatGPT pass high school exams on English Language comprehension? https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24094.20807
Dong, Y., & Shi, L. (2021). Using Grammarly to support students’ source-based writing practices. Assessing Writing, 50, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100564
Foltýnek, T., Meuschke, N., & Gipp, B. (2019). Academic plagiarism detection: A systematic literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 52(6), Article 112. https://doi.org/10.1145/3345317.
Foltýnek, T., Ruas, T., Scharpf, P., Meuschke, N., Schubotz, M., Grosky, W., & Gipp, B. (2020). Detecting machine-obfuscated plagiarism. In Sundqvist, A., Berget, G., Nolin, J., & Skjerdingstad, K. (Eds.), Sustainable Digital Communities. iConference 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science,12051, 816-827. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_68
Frye, B. L. (2022). Should using an AI text generator to produce academic writing be plagiarism? Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4292283
Fyfe, P. (2022). How to cheat on your final paper: Assigning AI for student writing. AI & Society. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01397-z
Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., & Pearson, A. T. (2022). Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.23.521610
Goldsmith, K. (2011, September 11). It’s not plagiarism. In the digital age, it’s ‘repurposing.’ The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/its-not-plagiarism-in-the-digital-age-its-repurposing/?cid=gen_sign_in
Higgins, J. R., Lin, F.-C., & Evans, J. P. (2016). Plagiarism in submitted manuscripts: Incidence, characteristics and optimization. of screening—case study in a major specialty medical journal. Research Integrity and Peer Review 1(13), 1-8. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s41073-016-0021-8
Hirvela, A., & Du, Q. (2013). “Why am I paraphrasing?”: Undergraduate ESL writers' engagement with source-based academic writing and reading. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(2), 87-98.
Howard, R. M. (1993). A plagiarism pentimento. Journal of Teaching Writing, 11(3), 233-246.
Howard, R. M. (1995). Plagiarisms, authorships, and the academic death penalty. College English, 57(7), 788–806. https://doi.org/10.2307/378403
Howard, R. M. (1999). Standing in the shadow of giants. Ablex.
Huh, S. (2023a). Are ChatGPT’s knowledge and interpretation ability comparable to those of medical students in Korea for taking a parasitology examination?: A descriptive study. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professionals, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.1
Huh, S. (2023b). Emergence of the metaverse and ChatGPT in journal publishing after the COVID-19 pandemic. Science Editing,10(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.290
Jabotinsky, H. Y., & Sarel, R. (2022). Co-authoring with an AI? Ethical dilemmas and artificial intelligence. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.4303959
Keck, C. (2006). The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing,15(4), 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.006
Keck, C. (2010). How do university students attempt to avoid plagiarism? A grammatical analysis of undergraduate paraphrasing strategies. Writing & Pedagogy 2(2),192-222.
Kitamura, F. C. (2023). ChatGPT is shaping the future of medical writing but still requires human judgment. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230171
Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., ChatGPT, Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., Maningo, J., & Tseng, V. (2022). Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.19.22283643
Kutela, B., Msechu, K., Das, S., & Kidando, E. (2023). Chatgpt's scientific writings: A case study on traffic safety. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4329120
Lin, L. H. F. , & Morrison, B. (2021). Challenges in academic writing: Perspectives of Engineering faculty and L2 postgraduate research students. English for Specific Purposes, 63, 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.03.004
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2020). Academic integrity at MIT: A handbook for students. https://integrity.mit.edu/handbook/academic-integrity-handbook
McKee, F., & Noever, D. (2022). Chatbots in a botnet world. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2212.11126
Mori, M. (2018). Our speech is filled with others’ words: Understanding university student and instructor opinions towards paraphrasing through a Bakhtinian lens. Ampersand, 5, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2018.11.002
Mori, M. (2019). Pluralizing the paraphrase: Reconsidering meaning via a typology of linguistic changes. TESOL Quarterly, 53(3), 885-895. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02910317
Neumann, H., Leu, S., & McDonough, K. (2019). L2 writers’ use of outside sources and the related challenges. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 106-120.
OpenAI's Assistant & Perlman, A. (2022) The implications of ChatGPT for legal services and society. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4294197
Pecorari, D. (2023). Good and original: plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-
language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing,12(4), 317-345.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.004
Prentice, F. M., & Kinden, C. E. (2018). Paraphrasing tools, language translation tools and plagiarism: An exploratory study. International Journal for Educational Integrity,14(11), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-018-0036-7
Purdue Online Writing Lab. (2022). Paraphrase: Write it in your own words. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/using_research/quoting_paraphrasing_and_summarizing/paraphrasing.html
Qadir, J. (2022). Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative
AI for education. TechRxiv. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.21789434.v1
Roe, J., & Perkins, M. (2022). What are automated paraphrasing tools and how do we address
them? A review of a growing threat to academic integrity. International Journal for
Educational Integrity,18(15), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00109-w
Rogerson, A. M., & McCarthy, G. (2017). Using internet based paraphrasing tools: Original work, patchwriting or facilitated plagiarism? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-016-0013-y
Shahare, M., & Roberts, L. L. (2020). Historicizing the crisis of scientific misconduct in Indian science. History of Science, 58 (4), 485–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0073275320930908
Shi, L. (2004). Textual borrowing in second-language writing. Written Communication, 21(2), 171–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303262846
Shi, L. (2012). Rewriting and paraphrasing source texts in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2),134–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.003
Sun, Y. C. (2013). Do journal authors plagiarize? Using plagiarism detection software to uncover matching text across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(4), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.07.002
University Grants Commission. (2018). UGC regulations on minimum qualifications for appointment of teachers and other academic staff in universities and colleges and measures for the maintenance of standards in higher education, 2018. https://www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/4033931_UGC-Regulation_min_Qualification_Jul2018.pdf
Ventayen, R. J. M. (2023). OpenAI ChatGPT generated results: Similarity index of artificial intelligence-based contents. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4332664
Wahle, J. P., Ruas, T., Foltynek, T., Meuschke, N., & Gipp, B. (2023). Identifying machine-paraphrased plagiarism. Authorea. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.167528156.61938925/v1
Walsh Marr, J. (2019). Making the mechanics of paraphrasing more explicit through grammatical metaphor. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 42,1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100783
Wette, R. (2017). Source text use by undergraduate post-novice L2 writers in disciplinary
assignments: Progress and ongoing challenges. Journal of Second Language Writing,
37, 46-58.
Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
