Critical Factors Influencing Bid Mark-up Decision in Public Street Project – A Review

Authors

  • Huzairi Zainul Azlan Quantity Surveying, School of Construction and Quantitiy Surveying, College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Shamsida Saidan Khaderi Quantity Surveying, School of Construction and Quantitiy Surveying, College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Anis Sazira Bakri Quantity Surveying, School of Construction and Quantitiy Surveying, College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/bej.v21i1.480

Keywords:

Critical factors, Bid mark-up, Public street projects

Abstract

Deciding a bid price with an appropriate mark-up added to the estimated project cost is essential for the contractors' business survival. However, the competitive environment had influenced contractors to offer the lowest bid price, leading to the submission of unrealistically low prices to win bids. This practice can impact disputes and adversarial relationships between parties during construction and provide an additional risk to the project delay, cost overrun, quality compromise and failure to complete the project. Therefore, this paper aims to provide an overview of the literature on critical factors influencing bid mark-up decisions in public street projects. The objectives are to identify methods and tools, including the critical factors in determining the contractors' bid mark-up decision. The approach is based on analysing pertinent publications on the theme. The top five (5) ranked factors influencing contractors' decision on bid mark-up size can be found in the literature: the number of bidders, the competitiveness of other bidders, relationship and experience with clients, experience on similar projects and project size. Besides that, the determination of mark-up size is based on experience, intuition, past bidding results, past bidding patterns of competitors, the client's tender estimate, the client's record, and financial ability.

References

Abdullah, I. S. (2020). Bid evaluation strategy among G7 construction companies in Sarawak (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Sarawak). https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/36729

Ab Hamid, J., Juni, M. H., Abdul Manaf, R., Syed Ismail, S. N., & Lim, P. Y. (2023). Spatial accessibility of primary care in the dual public–private health system in rural areas, Malaysia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3147. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043147

Adnan, H., Rami, M. I., Yusuwan, N. M., & Rosman, M. R. (2018). A survey on factors affecting the contractor’s mark-up size decision. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 15, 18-26. https://www.wseas.org/multimedia/journals/economics/2018/a085907-028.pdf

Aibinu, A. A., & Pasco, T. (2008). The accuracy of pre‐tender building cost estimates in Australia. Construction Management and Economics, 26(12), 1257–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802527514

Aje, I. O., Oladinrin, T. O., & Nwaole, A. N. (2016). Factors influencing success rate of contractors in competitive bidding for construction works in south-east, Nigeria. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 21(1), 19–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2016.21.1.2

Alexandersson, G., & Hultén, S. (2006). Predatory bidding in competitive tenders: A Swedish case study. European Journal of Law and Economics, 22, 73-94. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10657-006-8981-7

Alkhateeb, A. M., Hyari, K. H., & Hiyassat, M. A. (2020). Analyzing bidding competitiveness and success rate of contractors competing for Public Construction Projects. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 576–591. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-04-2020-0060

Awwad, R., & Ammoury, M. (2019). Owner’s perspective on evolution of bid prices under various price-driven bid selection methods. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000803

Awwad R. E. (2010). Neutral and risk-sensitive models for competitive bidding methods based on average and order statistics. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan). Retrieved April 5 2023 from https://www.proquest.com/openview/d5d658c58c5b6d22459a54909b7258c0/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750

Azman, M. A., Abdul-Samad, Z., & Ismail, S. (2013). The accuracy of preliminary cost estimates in Public Works Department (PWD) of Peninsular Malaysia. International Journal of Project Management, 31(7), 994–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.11.008

Bhatta, I. (2014). Issues related to selection of contractors in public construction procurement. Rural Infrastructure, 5(5), 184-189.

Bista, S. B., & Dahal, R. K. (2018). Assessment of Low Bidding in Bridge Construction with Special Reference to Nepal. International Journal of Research Granthaalayah, 6, 71-80. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v6.i10.2018.1163

Carr, P. G. (2005). Investigation of bid price competition measured through prebid project estimates, actual bid prices, and number of bidders. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(11), 1165–1172. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2005)131:11(1165)

Cheaitou, A., Larbi, R., & Al Housani, B. (2019). Decision making framework for tender evaluation and contractor selection in public organizations with risk considerations. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 68, 100620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2018.02.007

Chileshe, N., Kavishe, N., & Edwards, D. J. (2020). Critical factors influencing the bid or no-bid decision of the Indigenous Small Building Contractors in Tanzania. Construction Innovation, 21(2), 182–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-09-2019-0098

Department of Statistics Malaysia Official Portal. (2020). Retrieved March 22, 2023, from https://www.dosm.gov.my/mycendash/

Dulaimi, M. F., & Shan, H. G. (2002). The factors influencing bid mark-up decisions of large- and medium-size contractors in Singapore. Construction Management and Economics, 20(7), 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190210159890

Egemen, M., & Mohamed, A. N. (2007). A framework for contractors to reach strategically correct bid/no bid and mark-up size decisions. Building and Environment, 42(3), 1373-1385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.11.016

Egemen, M., & Mohamed, A. (2008). SCBMD: A knowledge-based system software for strategically correct bid/no bid and mark-up size decisions. Automation in Construction, 17(7), 864–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.02.013

Enshassi, A., Kumaraswamy, M., & Nairab, S. (2010). Analysis of contractors’ bidding decision in the Palestinian construction industry. Revista Ingenieria de Construccion (Journal of Construction Engineering), 25(2), 161-214. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/287995356.pdf

Ghodoosi, F., Bagchi, A., Hosseini, M. R., Vilutienė, T., & Zeynalian, M. (2021). Enhancement of bid decision-making in construction projects: A reliability analysis approach. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 27(3), 149–161. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA656445316&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=13923730&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E9a351d90&aty=open-web-entry

Hanák, T., Drozdová, A., & Marović, I. (2021). Bidding strategy in Construction Public Procurement: A Contractor’s perspective. Buildings, 11(2), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11020047

Hanák, T., & Muchová, P. (2015). Impact of competition on prices in Public Sector Procurement. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 729–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.601

Heralova, R. S. (2015). Highway projects: Prices in public bids. Procedia Engineering, 123, 496–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.101

Hillebrandt, P. M. (2000). Economic theory and the construction industry. Basingstoke: Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9780230372481

Jarkas, A. M. (2013). Primary factors influencing bid mark‐up size decisions of general contractors in Kuwait. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 18(1), 53-75. https://doi.org/10.1108/13664381311305078

Khoso, A. R., Yusof, M. A., Leghari, M. A., Siddiqui, F., & Sohu, S. (2021). Public tendering practices, issues and directions - A case of Pakistan Construction Sector. Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology, 29(1), 123-147. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.29.1.07

Kissi, E., Ahadzie, D. K., Adjei-Kumi, T., & Badu, E. (2017). Rethinking the challenges to the pricing of projects in the Ghanaian Construction Industry. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 15(5), 700–719. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-11-2016-0090

Laryea, S. (2022). 17. Economic principles of bidding for Construction Projects. Research Companion to Construction Economics, 351–370. https://books.google.com.my/books?hl=en&lr=&id=d61jEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA351&dq=Economic+principles+of+bidding+for+Construction+Projects&ots=B_xDxGFgAE&sig=mGX1ktncTBVkKErHKYY6WSEylM4&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Economic%20principles%20of%20bidding%20for%20Construction%20Projects&f=false

Leśniak, A., & Plebankiewicz, E. (2015). Modeling the decision-making process concerning participation in construction bidding. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(2), 04014032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000237

Ling, F. Y. Y. (2005). Global factors affecting margin-size of construction projects. Journal of Construction Research, 6(01), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1609945105000274

Lo, W., Lin, C. L., & Yan, M. R. (2007). Contractor’s opportunistic bidding behavior and equilibrium price level in the construction market. Journal of Construction Engineering And Management, 133(6), 409-416. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:6(409)

Mahamid, I. (2011). Early cost estimating for road construction projects using multiple regression techniques. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, The, 11(4), 87-101. https://search.informit.org/doi/epdf/10.3316/informit.772369219553131

Mohamed, S. M., Khalil, A. H., & Badawy, M. (2017). Factors Influencing the Markup Ratio in the Construction Industry. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, 6(12), 22889-22901. http://www.ijirset.com/upload/2017/december/116_Paper%20Manuscript%20_1_.pdf

Muhammed, A. O., Muhammed, A. A., Yakubu, H. A., Suleiman, A., & Adam, A. (2022). Assessment of factors affecting contractors tendering success for construction projects in North-Central Nigeria. International Journal of Real Estate Studies, 16(1), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.11113/intrest.v16n1.155

Nystrom, J. (2015). The balance of unbalanced bidding. Procedia Economics and Finance, 21, 97-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00155-0

Oo, B. L., Lo, H. P., & Teck‐Heng Lim, B. (2012). The effect of bidding success in construction bidding. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 19(1), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981211192553

Oo, B. L., Lim, T. H., & Runeson, G. (2022a). Critical factors affecting contractors’ decision to bid: A global perspective. Buildings, 12(3), 379. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12030379

Oo, B. L., Lim, B. T.-H., & Runeson, G. (2022b). Mark-up on construction projects: What have we learnt in the last 20 years? Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-01-2022-0070

Oyediran, O. S., & Asuquo, C. F. (2011). Factors affecting mark-up size decision of Nigerian building contractors. Journal of International Real Estate and Construction Studies, 1(2), 113. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christian-Asuquo/publication/286181630_Factors_affecting_mark-up_size_decision_of_Nigerian_building_contractors/links/62b051cae1193368baadc1ca/Factors-affecting-mark-up-size-decision-of-Nigerian-building-contractors.pdf

Oyeyipo, O. O., Odusami, K. T., Ojelabi, R. A., & Afolabi, A. O. (2016). Factors affecting contractors' bidding decisions for construction projects in Nigeria. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 21(2), 21–35. http://eprints.usm.my/41450/1/JCDC_21(2)_Art_2(21-35).pdf

Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia. (2020). Pekeliling Perbendaharaan Malaysia, Perolehan Kerajaan (PK) 2. 2020. Kaedah Perolehan Kerajaan. Putrajaya: Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia. https://ppp.treasury.gov.my/pindaan/selepas/208/muat-turun

Perbendaharaan Negeri Selangor. (2014). Pekeliling Perbendaharaan Negeri Selangor Bil. 7, 2014. Dasar Penilaian Perolehan Secara Sistem Cut-Off. Selangor: Perbendaharaan Negeri Selangor. https://dewan.selangor.gov.my/question/dasar-penilaian-perolehan/

Perera, B. A., Wijewickrama, M. K., Ranaweera, W. R., & Gamage, I. S. (2021). Significant factors influencing the bid mark-up decision of infrastructure projects in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(8), 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1583849

Selangor. (2021, August 27). Portal Rasmi Kerajaan Negeri Selangor. Retrieved from https://www.selangor.gov.my/index.php/pages/view/124

Selected Committee of Local Authorities. (2019, October 1). Statement from Selected Committee of Local Authorities for Selangor State Assembly on Allocation Issues Regarding to Malaysia Road Record Information System (MARRIS). Retrieved from http://dewan.selangor.gov.my/jawatan-pilihan-pihak-berkuasa-tempatan/

Suratkon, A., Yunus, R., & Deraman, R. (2020). Characteristics of procurement methods in Malaysia – comparing design-bid-build, design-build and Construction Management. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2020.11.03.001

Tan, Y., Shen, L., & Langston, C. (2010). Contractors’ competition strategies in bidding: Hong Kong study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(10), 1069-1077. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0000219

Tayeh, B. A., Alaloul, W. S., & Al-Ghazalli, N. K. (2019a). Tender pricing of infrastructure projects: Affecting factors. International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure 2019 (pp. 320-329), VA: American Society of Civil Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482650.033

Tayeh, B. A., Alaloul, W. S., & Muhaisen, W. B. (2019b). Challenges facing small-sized construction firms in the Gaza strip. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149501913010051

Wang, J., Wang, L., Ye, K., & Shan, Y. (2020). Will bid/No-bid decision factors for construction projects Be different in economic downturns? A Chinese study. Applied Sciences, 10(5), 1899. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10051899

Yap, Z. S., Kong, S. K., & Lee, H. C. (2019). Factors affecting the selection of the procurement methods for construction projects in Malaysia. Inti Journal, 2019(11). http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/1283/

Yang, J. B., & Wang, W. C. (2003). Contractor selection by the most advantageous tendering approach in Taiwan. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 26(3), 381-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2003.9670792

Ye, K., Shen, L., Xia, B., & Li, B. (2014). Key attributes underpinning different markup decision between public and private projects: A China study. International Journal of Project Management, 32(3), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.06.001

Zainon, A., Ayob, A., Munaaim, M. A. C., Zaki, M. F. M., & Elyas, S. F. (2016). Bid evaluation strategy among G7 construction companies in northern states of Malaysia. Research Journal of Fisheries and Hydrobiology 2016., 11(3), 24-30. https://www.aensiweb.net/AENSIWEB/rjfh/rjfh/2016/March/24-30.pdf

Zakaria, S. F., Zin, R. M., Mohamad, I., Balubaid, S., Mydin, S. H., & Mohd Rahim, E. M. (2017). Critical success factors in infrastructure projects. AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1903, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5011586

Zhang, Y., Oo, B. L., & Lim, B. T. H. (2022). Factors affecting contractors’ bid or no-bid and mark-up decisions: a case of the Jilin province, China. Construction Innovation, 23(5), 1232-1254. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-10-2021-0188

Downloads

Published

01-01-2024 — Updated on 01-01-2024

Versions

How to Cite

Zainul Azlan, H. ., Saidan Khaderi, S., & Bakri, A. S. (2024). Critical Factors Influencing Bid Mark-up Decision in Public Street Project – A Review. Built Environment Journal, 21(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.24191/bej.v21i1.480