Local Community Perspectives on Authenticity at the ‘Street of Harmony’, George Town World Heritage Site, Penang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/bej.v22iSI.5451Keywords:
Authenticity, Local Community, Sense of Place, World Heritage Site, Postcolonial, MulticulturalAbstract
Defining authenticity is challenging, partly due to the Eurocentric bias that shapes its definition and assessment. This power dynamic, combined with the frequent neglect of intangible heritage, complicates the issue and underscores the need for a more nuanced understanding of authenticity across diverse cultural contexts. As a site recognised for its multicultural heritage and historical significance, George Town in Penang, Malaysia faces increasing pressure to balance the expectations set by UNESCO with the realities of its local communities. These factors threaten the authenticity of heritage sites by prioritising economic gain over cultural integrity, thereby diluting the sense of place that local communities associate with their heritage. Hence, this study investigates the guiding principles that support authenticity and the nuanced relationships between local and global cultural values, revealing disparities in perceptions of authenticity between local communities and authorised groups at the ‘Street of Harmony’, George Town. The site, characterised by its urban, multicultural, and postcolonial setting, was explored through observational studies and semi-structured interviews. The findings highlight the pivotal role of local communities in shaping the authenticity paradigm and emphasise the importance of strengthening the sense of place to preserve cultural heritage. The research underscores the need to bridge differing interpretations of authenticity and advocates for inclusive strategies that integrate local perspectives, promote sustainable practices, and foster adaptive agreements among stakeholders. It calls for a broader, more inclusive conversation on heritage protection and management.
References
Apaydin, V. (2018). The Entanglement of the Heritage Paradigm: Values, Meanings and Uses. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 24(5), 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2017.1390488
Apotsos, M. (2012). Holy Ground: Mud, Materiality and Meaning in the Djenne Mosque. Rutgers Art Review, 27, 1–27.
Aris Anuar, A.N., Rahmat, N. I., Ahmad, C. B., Nasir, R. A., & Zainuddin, A. Z. (2024). The Resilience of Tourism at George Town Heritage Sites: Insights from Local Community Engagement during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Built Environment Journal, 21(Special Issue), 219–228. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/109946/1/109946.pdf
Boccardi, G. (2019). Authenticity in the Heritage Context: A reflection beyond the Nara Document, The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 10(1), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2018.1531647
Brumann, C. (2015) Community as myth and reality in the UNESCO World Heritage Convention. In N. Adell, R. Bendix, C. Bortolotto, & M. Tauschek (Eds.), Between imagined communities and communities of practice: Participation, territory and the making of heritage (pp. 273–290). Göttingen University Press. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.gup.191
Deacon, H. and Smeets, R. (2013). Authenticity, value and community involvement in heritage management under the World Heritage and Intangible Heritage Conventions. Heritage & Society, 6(2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1179/2159032X13Z.0000000009
Fahmi, M. M., Ahmad, Y. and Hashim, H. (2018). Understanding the values of the forgotten World Heritage pyramids in Sudan. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 8(6), 8–11. https://www.worldwidejournals.com/indian-journal-of-applied-research-(IJAR)/fileview/June_2018_1527841022__153.pdf
Gao, Q., & Jones, S. (2020). Authenticity and heritage conservation: seeking common complexities beyond the ‘Eastern’ and ‘Western’ dichotomy. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 27(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1793377
Harrison, R. and Rose, D. (2010). Intangible heritage. In T. Benton (Ed.), Understanding heritage and memory (238–276). Manchester University Press in association with the Open University.
Hawke, S. (2010). Belonging: The contribution of heritage to sense of place. In R. Amoêda, S. Lira, & C. Pinheiro (Eds.), Heritage 2010: Heritage and sustainable development (1331–1339). Greenlines Institute.
ICOMOS (1994). The Nara Document of Authenticity. Nara, Japan http://www.icomos.org/charters/nara-e.pdf
Jokilehto, J. (2017). orld Heritage and community involvement. In Nordic World Heritage Conference: Living in World Heritage and Community Involvement. Rauma, Finland. https://www.rauma.fi/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/JJokilehto_paper_NWHC2017.pdf
Jones, S. (2009). Experiencing authenticity at heritage sites: Some implications for heritage management and conservation. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 11(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1179/175355210X12670102063661
Khalaf, R. W. (2018). A proposal to apply the Historic Urban Landscape approach to reconstruction in the World Heritage context. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2018.1424615
Khalaf, R.W. (2021). World Heritage on the move: Abandoning the assessment of authenticity to meet the challenges of the twenty-first century. Heritage, 4(1), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4010023
Lawless, J. W. & Silva, K. D. (2017). Towards an integrative understanding of 'authenticity' of cultural heritage: An analysis of World Heritage Site designations in the Asian context. Journal of Heritage Management, 1(2), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455929616684450
Lim, S.S. (2020). Covid-19 Hits the Heart of George Town: A Survey of the Economic Situation of Old Trades in the Historic City. Penang Institute. https://penanginstitute.org/publications/covid-19-crisis-assessments/covid-19-hits-the-heart-of-george-town-a-survey-of-the-economic-situation-of-old-trades-in-the-historic-city/
Markevičienė, J. (2012). The spirit of the place – The problem of (re)creating. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 36(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2012.679789
Nakonieczna, E., & Szczepański, J. (2023). Authenticity of cultural heritage vis-à-vis heritage reproducibility and intangibility: From conservation philosophy to practice. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 30(2), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2023.2177642
Nara + 20. (2015). Nara + 20: On heritage practices, cultural values, and the concept of authenticity. Heritage & Society, 8(2), 144–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2015.1126115
Orgaz-Agüera, F., Huete-Alcocer, N., Gutiérrez-Tanoira, B., & García-Mestanza, J. (2025). Authenticity of architecture, place attachment, identity and support for sustainable tourism in World Heritage Sites. Tourism and Hospitality Management, 31(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.31.1.6
Ouf, A. M. S. (2001). Authenticity and the sense of place in urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 6(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800120032914
Silva, K. D. (2008). Rethinking the spirit of place: Conceptual convolutions and preservation pragmatics. In 16th ICOMOS General Assembly and International Symposium: Finding the spirit of place – Between the tangible and the intangible. Quebec, Canada. https://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/143/
Silva, K. D. (2015). The spirit of place of Bhaktapur, Nepal. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21(8), 820–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2015.1028962
Skounti, A. (2009). The authentic illusion: Humanity’s intangible cultural heritage, the Moroccan experience. In L. Smith & N. Akagawa (Eds.), Intangible heritage. Routledge.
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. Routledge.
Taha, S. (2014a). The value of memory: Suakin’s cultural heritage – Significant for whom? International Journal of Intangible Heritage, 9, 55–68. https://www.ijih.org/volumes/article/464
Taha, S. (2014b). Still a place to call home? Development and the changing character of place. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 5(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1179/1756750513Z.00000000033
The Vibes. (2024, July 27). Plan to return 10,000 Malay families to George Town. The Vibes. https://www.thevibes.com/articles/news/102904/plan-to-return-10000-malay-families-to-george-town
Think City Sdn Bhd. (2021). George Town World Heritage Site population and land use census 2009–2019. Think City. https://thinkcityinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/George-Town-A-City-in-Transition.pdf
Town and Country Planning Department Pulau Pinang (2016). Special area plan – George Town historic cities of the Straits of Malacca. Town and Country Planning Department, Penang.
Tunbridge, J. E. and Ashworth, G. J. (1996). Dissonant heritage: The management of the past as a resource in conflict. John Wiley & Sons.
UNESCO (2023). Operational guidelines for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. https://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/
UNESCO (2004). Yamato declaration on integrated approaches for safeguarding tangible and intangible cultural heritage. Nara, Japan. http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/files/23863/10988742599Yamato_Declaration.pdf/Yamato_Declaration.pdf
UNESCO (2008). UNESCO World Heritage Convention – World Heritage List: Melaka and George Town, historic cities of the Straits of Malacca. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1223
Zhu, Y. (2015). Cultural effects of authenticity: Contested heritage practices in China. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21(6), 594–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2014.991935
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aidatul Fadzlin Bakri, Nurulhusna Qamaruz Zaman, Zalina Samadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International
