A Methodology to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Designers' Cognitive Process when Using Multi-user Virtual Reality

Authors

  • Adlin Shaflina Azizo Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, MALAYSIA
  • Kherun Nita Ali Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, MALAYSIA
  • Noorminshah A. Iahad Azman Hashim International Business School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, MALAYSIA
  • Norhazren Izatie Mohd Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, MALAYSIA
  • Mohd Azwarie Mat Dzahir Azman Hashim International Business School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, MALAYSIA
  • Nafisah Abdul Rahiman Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, MALAYSIA

Keywords:

Multi-user Virtual Reality, Design Review, Construction Industry, Cognitive processes

Abstract

This paper proposed the mixed-mode methodology to evaluate the effectiveness of the cognitive process when using Multi-user Virtual Reality (VR) in the design review sessions. The research explains that the design review is essential for the planning process since it evaluates the client's requirements against the designers' design before the construction starts. Quality communication among the designers and clients plays a central role in enhancing the output of the design review session, apart from the quality of visualisation during the presentation. A multi-user VR system with a head-mounted display allows users to fully immerse in the virtual environment (VE) during the design review process and achieve quality discussion and decision-making. This paper describes the process of data collection in quantitative and qualitative methods, where questionnaires will be distributed to determine the state-of-the-art of the designers' cognitive processes when they are involved in the design review session. Parallelly, an experiment on the use of multi-user VR during a design review session will be conducted. Users (Designers) will be interviewed before and after the experiment. Finally, multi-user VR's effectiveness will be identified by comparing the findings from both quantitative and qualitative methods.

References

Balali, V., Zalavadia, A., & Heydarian, A. (2020). Real-Time Interaction and Cost Estimating within Immersive Virtual Environments. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(2), 04019098. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001752

Berg, M.V., Hartmann, T., & Graaf, R.D. (2017). Supporting design reviews with pre-meeting virtual reality environments. J. Inf. Technol. Constr., 22, 305-321.

Cham, H., Malek, S., Milow, P., & Ramli, M. R. (2020). Web-based system for visualisation of water quality index. All Life, 13(1), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895293.2020.1788998

Bauer, A., & Andringa, G. (2020). The Potential of Immersive Virtual Reality for Cognitive Training in Elderly. Gerontology, 66(6), 614–623. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509830

Demir, S. B., & Pismek, N. (2018). A Convergent Parallel Mixed-Methods Study of Controversial Issues in Social Studies Classes: A Clash of Ideologies. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(1), 119–149. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.1.0298

Gjerde, M. (2017). Informing Design Review: Discussion of the Findings of a Visual Preference Study in New Zealand. Procedia Engineering, 198, 562–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.111

Graf, H., & Stork, A. (Eds.). (2018). CAE/VR Integration – A Qualitative Assessment of Advanced Visualization for Interactive Conceptual Simulations (ICS) in Industrial Use Holger. Virtual, Augmented And Mixed Reality: Applications In Health, Cultural Heritage, And Industry, PT II: 10th International Conference Vamr 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91584-5

Górski, F., Buń, P., Wichniarek, R., Zawadzki, P., & Hamrol, A. (2015). Immersive City Bus Configuration System for Marketing and Sales Education. Procedia Computer Science, 75, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.230

Goulding, J., Nadim, W., Petridis, P., & Alshawi, M. (2012). Construction industry offsite production: A virtual reality interactive training environment prototype. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2011.09.004

Jamei, E., Mortimer, M., Seyedmahmoudian, M., Horan, B., & Stojcevski, A. (2017). Investigating the Role of Virtual Reality in Planning for Sustainable Smart Cities. Sustainability, 9(11), 2006. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112006

Liu, Y., Castronovo, F., Messner, J., & Leicht, R. (2020). Evaluating the Impact of Virtual Reality on Design Review Meetings. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 34(1), 04019045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)cp.1943-5487.0000856

Mathers, J., Illman, S., Brady, A., & Geraghty, D. P. (2013). Design Review Principles and Practice. Design Council.

Mastrolembo Ventura, S., Castronovo, F., & Ciribini, A. L. (2020). A design review session protocol for the implementation of immersive virtual reality in usability-focused analysis. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 25, 233–253. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2020.014

Moser, I., Chiquet, S., Strahm, S. K., Mast, F. W., & Bergamin, P. (2020). Group Decision-Making in Multi-User Immersive Virtual Reality. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(12), 846–853. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0065

Paes, D., & Irizarry, J. (2018). A Usability Study of an Immersive Virtual Reality Platform for Building Design Review: Considerations on Human Factors and User Interface. Construction Research Congress 2018. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481264.041

Roupé, M., Johansson, M., Maftei, L., Lundstedt, R., & Viklund-Tallgren, M. (2020). Virtual Collaborative Design Environment: Supporting Seamless Integration of Multitouch Table and Immersive VR. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(12), 04020132. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001935

Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 69(S2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1

Selivanov, V. V, Selivanova, L. N., & Babieva, N. S. (2020). Cognitive Processes and Personality Traits in Virtual Reality Educational and Training, 13(2).

Shi, Y., Du, J., Ragan, E., Choi, K., & Ma, S. (2018). Social Influence on Construction Safety Behaviors: A Multi-User Virtual Reality Experiment. Construction Research Congress 2018. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481288.018

Torda, A. (2020). CLASSIE teaching – using virtual reality to incorporate medical ethics into clinical decision making. BMC Medical Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02217-y

Wong, Y. Y. R., Wong, P. L., Wong, P. W., & Goh, C. P. (2020). The Implementation of Virtual Reality ( VR ) in Tertiary Education in Malaysia, 1–6.

Wu, H., Cai, T., Luo, D., Liu, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2021). Immersive virtual reality news: A study of user experience and media effects. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 147, 102576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102576

Yildirim, T., & Yavuz, A. O. (2012). Comparison of Traditional and Digital Visualization Technologies in Architectural Design Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.120

Downloads

Published

18-05-2025

How to Cite

A Methodology to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Designers’ Cognitive Process when Using Multi-user Virtual Reality. (2025). Built Environment Journal, 19(2), 60-66. https://journal.uitm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/BEJ/article/view/6546

Similar Articles

21-30 of 134

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.