Research and Publication Trends in Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG), Sustainable and Responsible Investment (SRI) and Maqasid Shariah Framework Between 2012-2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/jikm.v12i1.5896Keywords:
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG), Sustainable and Responsible Investment (SRI), Maqasid Shariah, Islamic FinanceAbstract
People's perceptions of the necessity of financial management have changed as a consequence of global crisis. The consequence of this circumstance not only jeopardises a country's stability, but if it cannot be avoided, it might have an impact on the community's crime rate. The necessity for investment has benefited society and the government in their efforts to achieve long-term financial stability, and it may also improve quality of life. The objective of this article is to analyze research and publication trends in environmental, social and governance (ESG), sustainable and responsible investment (SRI) and Maqasid Shariah framework between 2012 to 2021. The methodology that has been applied in this article is descriptive research based on document analysis on previous research and publication on environmental, social and governance (ESG), sustainable and responsible investment (SRI) and Maqasid Shariah framework either from free-of-charge or free-of-registration online journals. The journals and articles are acquired from various sources of channel such as google scholar, science direct and researchgate.com. 211 articles have been collected and examined for the purpose of this research. This study perceived at several variables which include authorship trend, number of articles published, research technique, geographical affiliation, issue, and author gender. The general finding of this study illustrates that most of the previous study discussed on ESG disclosure and social responsible investment, while only limited number of research and publication have been discussed and published on Maqasid Shariah framework related to ESG and SRI.
References
Ab. Aziz, Muhammad Ridhwan, "A Review On Literatures Of Islamic Financial Institutions and Market Between 2010 – 2020" (2021). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 5029. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5029
Ab. Aziz, Muhammad Ridhwan; Nooh, Mohammad Noorizzuddin; Khairi, Khairil Faizal; Johari, Fuadah; Iskandar Mirza, Azrul Azlan; And Nordin, Nurul Izzati, "A Review On Literatures In Planning And Managing Of Islamic Wealth Distribution (2001-2013)" (2014). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1144
Blaine Townsend. (2020). From sri to esg: The origins of socially responsible and sustainable investing. The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing, 10-25.
Carl Hung. (2021, September 23). Three Reasons Why CSR And ESG Matter To Businesses. Retrieved from Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2021/09/23/three-reasons-why-csrand-esg-matter-to-businesses/?sh=3956626939b9
Cowton. (1998). Socially responsible investment. Encyclopaedia of Applied Ethics, 181-190.
Cranston S. (2004, August 13). Too much money, too few deals. Retrieved from Financial Mail: http://www.free.financialmail.co.za/report04/sanlam
Dawabah, A. M. (2009). Al-Istismar Fi al-Islam. Cairo: Dar al-Salam. Forum, S. I. (2006). 2005 Report on Socially Responsible Investing Trends in the United States. Washington, DC: Social Investment Forum.
Gendron, C. a.-F. (2007). The New Economic Social Movements at the Heart of a New Governance. Organisations & Territoires, 23–32.
Han, J., Kim, H., & Yu. (2016). Empirical study on relationship between corporate social responsibility and. Asian J. Sustain. Soc. Responsib, 61–76.
Indarawati Tarmuji, R. M. (2016). The Impact of Environmental, Social and Governance Practices (ESG) on Economic Performance: Evidence from ESG Score . International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 67-74.
James Chen. (2021, August 17). Socially Responsible Investment. Retrieved from Investopedia: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sri.asp
M, M. (2000). Socially responsible investment: a guide for pension fund managers. Suffolk, UK: Monitor Press.
M.S Abdul Rasool, M. A. (2020). WELLBEING OF THE SOCIETY: A MAQASID AlSHARI‘AH APPROACH. Afkar, 25-46.
María, J. L.-Q. (2018). The Value Relevance of Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance: The Brazilian Case. Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability.
Mohamad Zaki Razaly, A. H. (2018). MAQASID AL-SHARI’AH TOWARDS INVESTMENT: QURANIC APPROACH. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology , 1739–1746.
Monica Billio, M. C. (2021). Inside the ESG ratings: (Dis)agreement and performance. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, 1426–1445.
Shaykh Muhammad Al-Tahir Ibn Ashur. (2006). Ibn Ashur: Treatise on Maqasid Al-Shariah Paperback. zaytuna: International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT).
White MA. (1995). The performance of environmental mutual funds in the United States and Germany: is there economic hope for “green” investors? Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 323-324.
Zhou, M. (2021, June 20). ESG, SRI, and Impact Investing: What's the Difference? Retrieved from Investopidia: https://www.investopedia.com/financial-advisor/esg-sri-impactinvesting-explaining-difference-clients/#toc-esg
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright of articles that appear in the journal belongs exclusively to Faculty of Information Science, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Publisher). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions or any other reproductions of similar nature.
