Perceptions and Usage of AI-Based Applications among Plantation Students in Malaysian Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/jikm.v15i2.7421Keywords:
AI application usage , AI in education , Plantation students , Students perceptionsAbstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in higher education has transformed traditional academic practices offer new opportunities for enhanced learning. This study examines the perceptions, usage patterns, and acceptance of AI-based applications among plantation students in Malaysian universities. A total of 150 students across diploma, bachelor, and master’s programs participated in the study. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire covering five dimensions: types of AI application used, role of AI in learning, perceived benefits and limitations, impact on academic tasks, and ethical considerations. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses revealed that AI applications particularly ChatGPT, QuillBot and Copy.ai were frequently used for assignments, paraphrasing, and academic research. Students largely perceived AI as useful, with noted benefits in writing improvement and time efficiency. Nonetheless, concerns about content reliability, overdependence and ethical implications were reported. Approximately half of the respondents expressed willingness to continue using AI applications and recommending them to others. The study concludes that while AI applications are generally well-received, there remains a critical need for guided integration and enhanced digital literacy to support responsible and effective use in academic settings. The findings offer insights for educators, developers, and policymakers in shaping AI-based education strategies.
References
Adamson, K. A., & Prion, S. (2013). Reliability: measuring internal consistency using Cronbach's α. Clinical simulation in Nursing, 9(5), e179-e180.
Alawneh, Y. J. J., Sleema, H., Salman, F. N., Alshammat, M. F., Oteer, R. S., & ALrashidi, N. K. N. (2024, April). Adaptive Learning Systems: Revolutionizing Higher Education through AI-Driven Curricula. In 2024 International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Communication Systems (ICKECS) (Vol. 1, pp. 1-5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICKECS61492.2024.10616675
Alkan, A. (2024). Use of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Journal of the Human and Social Science Researches (Itobiad). https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1331201
Alotaibi, N. S. (2024). The Impact of AI and LMS Integration on the Future of Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Strategies for Transformation. Sustainability, 16(23), 10357. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310357
Amsal, M. F., & Sagita, D. D. (2024). Utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Learning for College Students. Pedagogi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 24(2), 275–282. https://doi.org/10.24036/pedagogi.v24i2.2258
Balat, Ş., YAVUZ, M., & KAYALI, B. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence as Academic Assistant (pp. 138–157). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1351-0.ch007
Balogh, A. (2024). Educational Innovation of Using Artificial Intelligence in University Education: a Comprehensive Student Survey. Internatinal Journal on Lifelong Education and Leadership. https://doi.org/10.25233/ijlel.1528746
Bampasidou, M., Goldgaber, D., Gentimis, T., & Mandalika, A. (2024). Overcoming ‘Digital Divides’: Leveraging higher education to develop next generation digital agriculture professionals. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 224, 109181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.109181
Bhatia, A., Bhatia, P., & Sood, D. (2024). Leveraging AI to transform online higher education: Focusing on personalized learning, assessment, and student engagement. International Journal of Management and Humanities (IJMH) Volume-11 Issue-1. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4959186
Caetano, A., Aponte, A., & Sra, M. (2025). A design toolkit for task support with mixed reality and artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 6, 1536393.
Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data–evolution, challenges and research agenda. International journal of information management, 48, 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021
Gjermeni, F., & Prodani, F. (2024). AI and Student Engagement: A Comparative Analysis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development, 11(3), 195. https://doi.org/10.56345/ijrdv11n326
Holzinger, A., Fister, I., Kaul, H. P., & Asseng, S. (2024). Human-centered AI in smart farming: Toward agriculture 5.0. IEEe Access, 12, 62199-62214. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3395532
Jain, S. (2024). A Comparative Assessment of Advanced Conversational Agents: A Multifaceted Evaluation of ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude. International Journal Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 14(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.46338/ijetae0224_07
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
Korteling, J. H., van de Boer-Visschedijk, G. C., Blankendaal, R. A., Boonekamp, R. C., & Eikelboom, A. R. (2021). Human-versus artificial intelligence. Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 4, 622364. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.622364
Lengyel, P., Felvégi, E., & Füzesi, I. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligence in agricultural higher education: Transforming learning and research. Journal of Agricultural Informatics, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.17700/jai.2024.15.2.738
Magruder, M. L., Delanois, R. E., Nace, J., & Mont, M. A. (2023). ChatGPT and Other Natural Language Processing Artificial Intelligence Models in Adult Reconstruction. Journal of Arthroplasty. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.06.030
Mallillin, L. L. D. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Towards Students’ Academic Performance. Innovare Journal of Education, 16–21. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2024v12i4.51665
Møgelvang, A., Bjelland, C., Grassini, S., & Ludvigsen, K. (2024). Gender Differences in the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Higher Education: Characteristics and Consequences. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1363.
Nga, V. T. (2024). The application of artificial intelligence in teaching writing skills to english major students at the national academy of public administration: benefits and challenges. Viện Đại Học Mở Hà Nội, 36. https://doi.org/10.59266/houjs.2024.457
Özduran, E., Hancı, V., Erkin, Y., Özbek, İ. C., & Abdulkerimov, V. (2025). Assessing the readability, quality and reliability of responses produced by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity regarding most frequently asked keywords about low back pain. PeerJ, 13, e18847. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18847
Paek, S., & Kim, N. (2021). Analysis of worldwide research trends on the impact of artificial intelligence in education. Sustainability, 13(14), 7941. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147941
Pham, N. Q. N. (2024). The Perspectives of Post-graduates Majoring in English Regarding the Usage of QuillBot to Enhance Paraphrasing Skills. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 1(1), 29-40.
Rahman, M. K., Hossain, M. A., Ismail, N. A., Hossen, M. S., & Sultana, M. (2025). Determinants of students’ adoption of AI chatbots in higher education: the moderating role of tech readiness. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-12-2024-0312
Rajki, Z., Dringo-Horvath, I., & Nagy, J. T. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in higher education: Students' Artificial Intelligence use and its influencing factors. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 22(2), 1-21.
Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Shahid, A. R., & Mishra, S. (2024). A Framework for a Master’s in Applied Artificial Intelligence Program in Computer and Information Systems Discipline. Deleted Journal, 35(4), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.62273/eqze3625
Singh, T., Reddy, C. K. K., Murthy, B. V. R., Nag, A., & Doss, S. (2024). AI and Education. Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design Book Series, 131–160. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8151-9.ch005
Sublime, J., & Renna, I. (2024). Is ChatGPT Massively Used by Students Nowadays? A Survey on the Use of Large Language Models such as ChatGPT in Educational Settings. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.17486.
Sunitha, Dr. M., Vijitha, B., & Gunavardhan, E. (2023). Artificial Intelligence based Smart Education System. 1346–1350. https://doi.org/10.1109/icesc57686.2023.10193720
Tiara, T., & Pamuji, F. Y. (2024). Komparasi usability chatgpt vs gemini ai berdasarkan iso/iec 9126 dan nielsen model menggunakan metode usability testing. JUSIM (Jurnal Sistem Informasi Musirawas), 9(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.32767/jusim.v9i1.2285
Zhao, C. (2025). AI-assisted assessment in higher education: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.61414/jeti.v6i4.209
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 NOOR ZUBAIDAH ABDUL RAHMAN, NORMALA AHMAD, NUR HIDAYAH ABD RASHID, NORNZEEHA ABDUL HAKIM, SELVAKKUMAR K N VAIAPPURI, WAN NUR AISYAH ABDUL RAOF
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright of articles that appear in the journal belongs exclusively to Faculty of Information Science, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Publisher). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions or any other reproductions of similar nature.
