Servant Leadership and Knowledge Management Capabilities in Malaysian Higher Education: A Post-2020 Empirical Review

Authors

  • Daljeet Singh Sedhu Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch, Seri Iskandar Campus, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
  • Nuramira Anuar Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch, Seri Iskandar Campus, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
  • Nordiana Mohd Nordin Faculty of Information Science, Universiti Teknologi MARA Selangor Branch, Puncak Perdana Campus, 40150 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Ismie Roha Mohamed Jais Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Selangor Branch, Shah Alam Campus, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Azman Mat Isa Faculty of Information Science, Universiti Teknologi MARA Selangor Branch, Puncak Perdana Campus, 40150 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Laura Christ Dass Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Selangor Branch, Shah Alam Campus, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Puteri Rohani Megat Abdul Rahim Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch, Seri Iskandar Campus, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/jikm.v15i2.8747

Keywords:

servant leadership, higher education, Malaysia, faculty engagement, affective commitment, innovation, trust, multilevel analysis, longitudinal study

Abstract

Servant leadership has gained prominence in higher education as a value-driven, follower-centric leadership approach. This study synthesises recent empirical research (2020 onwards) on servant leadership practices in Malaysian higher education institutions, focusing on updated theoretical models, measurement scales, and the impact of servant leadership on key academic outcomes. Evidence from multi-sample surveys, structural equation modelling, and a longitudinal study highlights that servant leadership behaviours among academic leaders foster higher faculty work engagement, job performance, affective commitment, and innovation. Mediating mechanisms such as trust in leadership, leader-member exchange, job satisfaction, psychological climate, and career satisfaction explain how servant leadership translates into these positive outcomes. A multilevel validation of Liden et al.’s 28-item Servant Leadership Scale (SL-28) in Malaysian academia yielded a refined five-factor model, suggesting contextual nuances in operationalising servant leadership. In addition, longitudinal findings further established that servant leadership influences faculty attitudes and performance even amid disruptions (e.g., the COVID-19 pandemic). This review also discusses cultural and institutional factors; the findings obtained showed that servant leadership aligns well with Malaysian higher education contexts and is not hindered by high power-distance or paternalistic cultural norms. The paper concludes with implications for leadership development in universities and future research directions, emphasising the role of servant leadership in fostering an ethical, engaged, and innovative academic community.

References

Aboramadan, M., Dahleez, K., & Hamad, M. H. (2020). Servant leadership and academics’ outcomes in

higher education: The role of job satisfaction. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 28(3), 562–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-12-2019-1970

Dami, Z. A., Imron, A., Burhanuddin, B., & Supriyanto, A. (2022). Servant leadership and job

satisfaction: The mediating role of trust and leader-member exchange. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 1036668. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1036668

Dul, V., Sam, R., Hak, S., Bou, D., Vy, S., & Kheuy, S. (2024). Servant Leadership Style in Higher

Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 2(6), 116–139.

Ghasemy, M., Elwood, J. A., & Roshan Nejad, M. (2022a). Academics to serve the communities:

Examining the hierarchical structure of a multidimensional servant leadership model in academia. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 26(1), 111–134. https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/article/view/3029

Ghasemy, M., & Frömbling, L. (2022b). A conditional time-varying multivariate latent growth curve

model for the relationships between academics’ servant leadership behavior, affective commitment, and job performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01568-6

Latif, K. F., Mas-Machuca, M., Marimon, F., & Sahibzada, U. F. (2021). Servant leadership, career, and

life satisfaction in higher education: A cross-country study of Spain, China, and Pakistan. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 16(3), 1221–1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09845-3

Maalouf, G. Y. (2023). The role of servant leadership style in improving innovation in higher education

institutions. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(9), Article e01787. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i9.1787

Zainab, S. S., Ungku Ahmad, U. N., & Irfan, M. (2022). Impact of servant leadership on employee work

engagement: Mediating role of psychological climate. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 16(3), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.51709/19951272/Summer-2022/6

Downloads

Published

01-10-2025

How to Cite

Sedhu, D. S. ., Anuar, N., Mohd Nordin, N. ., Mohamed Jais, I. R., Mat Isa, A., Christ Dass, L., & Megat Abdul Rahim, P. R. (2025). Servant Leadership and Knowledge Management Capabilities in Malaysian Higher Education: A Post-2020 Empirical Review. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 15(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.24191/jikm.v15i2.8747

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories