Sensitivity Analysis of Reaction Kinetics in Saponification of Ethyl Acetate and Sodium Hydroxide in Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/mjcet.v8i2.8714Keywords:
CSTR, Sensitivity analysis, Reaction kinetics, Saponification, Ethyl acetate, RSME, Sodium hydroxideAbstract
Continuous stirred-tank reactors (CSTRs) are integral to industrial chemical processes due to their uniform mixing and steady-state operation. The saponification of ethyl acetate with sodium hydroxide is a widely used model reaction for studying kinetics in CSTRs. Understanding the sensitivity of reaction kinetics to operating conditions is critical for enhancing reactor performance, ensuring consistent product quality, and minimizing inefficiencies. Reaction kinetics in a CSTR are influenced by reactant concentrations, temperature, and flow rate. Misidentifying or poorly optimizing these parameters can result in suboptimal performance and reduced conversion efficiency, posing challenges for industrial applications. This study conducts a detailed sensitivity analysis to identify the key parameters influencing the saponification reaction in a CSTR. It quantifies how variations in these parameters affect conversion efficiency and overall reaction performance, providing actionable insights for process optimisation. A reaction kinetics model was selected and validated using robust pilot-plant experimental data. Parameters, including reactor temperature, were systematically analysed through numerical simulations to assess their sensitivity and impact on system performance. The validated model demonstrated strong agreement with experimental results, yielding RMSE values ranging from 0.0007 to 0.0013 and R² values between 0.9996 and 0.9999 across 30, 40, 50, and 60 °C. Maximum deviation remained below 0.6 %, highlighting the model’s predictive accuracy and industrial applicability. Sensitivity analysis showed the greatest marginal benefit between 30 and 40 °C, with a peak sensitivity ratio of 0.00072, indicating that small temperature adjustments in this range have the greatest impact on the final conversion of ethyl acetate. This study sets itself apart from classical saponification research by integrating pilot-plant data with MATLAB-based analysis, offering a validated dataset and a meaningful contribution to chemical reaction engineering.
References
Alberton, A. L., Schwaab, M., Schmal, M., & Pinto, J. C. (2009). Experimental errors in kinetic tests and its influence on the precision of estimated parameters: Part I-Analysis of first-order reactions. Chemical Engineering Journal, 155(3), 816–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.08.012
Álvarez, C., Espinel, E., & Noriega, C. J. (2021). Study of different alternatives for dynamic simulation of a steam generator using MATLAB. Fluids, 6(5), 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids6050175
Berton, M., de Souza, J. M., Abdiaj, I., McQuade, D. T., & Snead, D. R. (2020). Scaling continuous API synthesis from milligram to kilogram: extending the enabling benefits of micro to the plant. International Journal of Flow Chemistry, 10(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41981-019-00060-x
Borovinskaya, E., Khaydarov, V., Strehle, N., Musaev, A., & Reschetilowski, W. (2019). Experimental studies of ethyl acetate saponification using different reactor systems: The effect of volume flow rate on reactor performance and pressure drop. Applied Sciences, 9(3), 532. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9030532
Cherkasov, N., Adams, S. J., Bainbridge, E. G. A., & Thornton, J. A. M. (2022). Continuous stirred tank reactors in fine chemical synthesis for efficient mixing, solids-handling, and rapid scale-up. International Reaction Chemistry and Engineering, 8(2), 266–277. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2re00232a
Danish, M., Khaloofah, M., Mesfer, A., Rashid, M., & Al Mesfer, M. K. (2015). Effect of operating conditions on CSTR performance: An experimental study. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 5(2), 74–78.
Das, K., Sahoo, P., Sai Baba, M., Murali, N., & Swaminathan, P. (2011). Kinetic studies on saponification of ethyl acetate using an innovative conductivity-monitoring instrument with a pulsating sensor. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 43(11), 648–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.20597
Florez-Orrego, D., Sharma, S., & Navabi, S. (2022). Editorial: Integration and optimization in the chemical process industry. Frontiers in Chemical Engineering, 4, 961022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fceng.2022.961022.
Harmon Ray, W. & Villa, C. (2000). Nonlinear dynamics found in polymerization processes — A review. Chemical Engineering Science, 55(2), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2509(99)00323-1.
He, Z. (2023). Optimization of chemical environmental protection and energy sustainable development. Applied and Computational Engineering, 3(1), 211–215. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/3/20230414
Hu, C. (2021). Reactor design and selection for effective continuous manufacturing of pharmaceuticals. Journal of Flow Chemistry, 11, 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41981-021-00164-3
Ihsanullah, I., Ahmad, M. I., Ullah, I., Ahmad, M. I., & Younas, M. (2015). Optimization of saponification reaction in a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) using design of experiments. Pakistan Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274635862
Leveneur, S. (2023). Kinetic modelling: Regression and validation stages, a compulsory tandem for kinetic model assessment. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 101(12), 7078–7101. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.24956
Levenspiel, O. (1999). Chemical Reaction Engineering (3rd ed.). Wiley India.
Mesfer, M. K. A. (2018). Experimental study of batch reactor performance for ethyl acetate saponification. International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 16(1), 20160174. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2016-0174
Mukhtar, A., Shafiq, U., Qazi, M. O., Qadir, H. A., Qizilbash, M., & Awan, B. A. (2017). Kinetics of alkaline hydrolysis of ethyl acetate by conductometric measurement approach over temperature ranges (298.15–343.15 K). Austin Chemical Engineering, 4(1), 1046.
Muktar, A., Shafiq, U., Khan, A., Qizilbash, M., & Abdul Qadir, H. (2015). Estimation of parameters of Arrhenius equation for ethyl acetate saponification reaction. Research Journal of Chemical Sciences, 5(11), 46–50.
Nauman, E. B. (2008). Chemical reactor design, optimization, and scaleup (First edition). Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Petek, A., & Krajnc, M. (2012). The enthalpy and entropy of activation for ethyl acetate saponification. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 44(10), 692–698. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.20712
Scott, K. (1991). The continuous stirred tank electrochemical reactor. An overview of dynamic and steady state analysis for design and modelling. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 21(11), 945–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01077579
Sultan, F., Lodhi, M. W., Fatima, R., Ishaq, M. S., & Chambashi, G. (2024). Computing the solution trajectories, steady state approximation, and sensitivity analysis in complex chemical reaction mechanism. AIP Advances, 14(4). 045027. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0203877
Sysoev, A. (2023). Sensitivity analysis of mathematical models. Computation (Basel), 11(8), 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation11080159.
Temizel, B., & Soylu, E. N. (2025). Modeling of diatom indices (Bdı, Tdı and Gdı) based on the physico-chemical structure of the river ecosystem with machine learning and artificial intelligence methods; A comparative example. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06186-4
Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., & Li, D. (2020). Temperature Optimization Control of CSTR. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Information Technology, Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (ICIBA), 1, 1040–1043. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIBA50161.2020.9276793
Wijayarathne, U., & Wasalathilake, K. (2014). Aspen Plus simulation of saponification of ethyl acetate in the presence of sodium hydroxide in a plug flow reactor. Journal of Chemical Engineering & Process Technology, 5(6), 205. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2157-7048.1000205
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sherif Abdulbari Ali, Nur Hannani Mohamad Azehar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
