Innovative in Teaching Mandarin through Scaffolding Strategies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/eaj.v10i2.12359

Keywords:

Scaffolding, Google Slides, Google Classroom, Online Distance Learning

Abstract

The arrival of advanced communication and information technologies has changed the method of teaching and learning in the 21st century. Thus, different types of impactful teaching approaches have been applied by educators to ensure that the focus of education is not only to deliver knowledge but also to cultivate students’ problem solving, creativity, collaboration and communication skills. In view of a subject which is totally new to students, they need time to learn and practise the skills learned which include listening, speaking, reading and writing. However, the credit hour for the particular subject is only two hours per week, which is a challenge for the lecturer to guide students in achieving the learning outcomes of the subject and to implement the teaching and learning process. Therefore, the
scaffolding teaching method was chosen as an action research to see the impact on student’s learning. The focus of the study was Introductory Mandarin Level 1. The new roles of teachers were applied through a mechanism including self-learning, group discussion, and presentation. Lecturer had designed and created self-learning notes as a reference to help students understand the particular lesson, facilitated students using effective questioning skills and summarized the lesson at the end to scaffold students’ learning. At the end of the semester, students were required to answer a survey questionnaire regarding teaching and learning. This approach gave a positive result which showed that it managed to motivate students to participate in class. Students enjoyed the activities in class and were more active and confident to express their ideas as they understood the topic well during their discussion rather than one way lecture in the class.

Author Biographies

  • Yann Sheng Chan, MARA University of Technology

    Academy of Language Studies, Malaysia,
    University Technology MARA
    Shah Alam, Malaysia

  • Choo Peng Tan, Multimedia University

    Faculty of Information Science and Technology,
    Multimedia University, Malaysia

  • Oi Leng Chong, MARA University of Technology

    Academy of Language Studies, Malaysia,
    University Technology MARA
    Shah Alam, Malaysia

  • Chun Keat Yeap, MARA University of Technology

    Academy of Language Studies, Malaysia,
    University Technology MARA
    Shah Alam, Malaysia

References

Allam, S. N. S., Hassan, M. S., Mohideen, R. S., Ramlan, A. F., & Kamal, R. M. (2020). Online Distance Learning Readiness During Covid-19 Outbreak Among Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(5), 642–657.

Buletin Anjakan Bil. 4 (2015). Kementerian Pelajaran Melaysia. Putrajaya, Malaysia.

Cho, M. H., & Summers, J. (2012). Factor validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) in asynchronous online learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 23, 5-28.

Chung, E., Subramaniam, G., & Dass, L. C. (2020). Online Learning Readiness Among University Students in Malaysia Amidst Covid-19. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 45. doi:10.24191/ajue.v16i2.10294

Collins, J. (2009). Education techniques for lifelong learning: Lifelong learning in the 21st century and beyond. Radiographics, 29, 613-622. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.292085179

Dabbagh, n., & Kitsantas, a. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33, 513-540.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EduCAUSE Review.

https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-andonline-learning.

Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379–432.

Janneke.V.D.P., Neil, M., & Monique, V. (2019). Scaffolding Student Understanding in Small-Group Work: Students’ Uptake of Teacher Support in Subsequent Small-Group Interaction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28( 2), 206-239.

Jafri, N., & Manaf, U. K. A. (2020). Looking into Students' Willingness to Communicate: A Case Study in Mandarin Language Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(1A), 123-131. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081316

Imam, K., Akbar, M.G., & Achmad, R. (2020). Effectiveness of Scaffolding Strategies in Learning Against Decrease in Mathematics Anxiety Level. Numerical: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 13-22.

Majid, A. H. A., & Stapa, S. H. (2017). The Use Of Scaffolding Technique Via Facebook In Improving Descriptive Writing Among Esl Learners. The Southeast Asian Journal Of English Language Studies, 23(4), 77–88. Https://Doi.Org/Http://103.219.237.47/3l/Article/View/20559

N.N. Padmadewi (2016). Techniques of promoting autonomous learning in the classroom. Journal of Education and Social Sciences 3, 45-52.

N.N. Padmadewi, L.P. Artini. (2018). Using Scaffolding Strategies in Teaching Writing For Improving Student Literacy in Primary School. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 178, 156-160. https://doi.org/10.2991/icoie-18.2019.36

Partnership for 21st Century. (2009). P21 framework definitions: Partnership for 21st Century Skills.

Retriewed from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519462.pdf

Rokhmat, J., Marzuki, Wahyudi, & Putrie, S. D. (2019). A strategy of scaffolding development to increasestudents’ problem-solvingabilities: The case of physics learning with causalitic-thinking approach. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(4), 569-579.

Shin, Y., Kim, D., & Song, D. (2020). Types and Timing of Scaffolding to Promote Meaningful Peer Interaction and Increase Learning Performance in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(3), 640-661.

Stuart, J. & Rutherford, R. (1978). ‘Medical Student Concentration During Medical Lectures.’ Lancet 2, 514-516.

UNO (2020 August). Education during COVID-19 and beyond. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO. Paris, France.

Van de Pol, Volman & Beishuizen (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research, Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271-296.

Volet, S., Vauras, M., Salo, A. E., & Khosa, D. (2017). Individual contributions in student-led collaborative learning: Insights from two analytical approaches to explain the quality of group outcome. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 79–92.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Yusup, H. (2014). 21 Century Education: Are we heading towards the right direction of improving teaching and learning as needed by educational transformation programme (Ph.D) Conference: 8th International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention 2014, At Concorde Inn, KLIA, Selangor Malaysia, 1-21.

Zeiadee M. K. (2018). EFL Students’ Perceptions towards Using Google Docs and Google Classroom as Online Collaborative Tools in Learning Grammar. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 2(2), 33–48.

Downloads

Published

29-11-2021

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yann Sheng Chan, Choo Peng Tan, Oi Leng Chong, & Chun Keat Yeap. (2021). Innovative in Teaching Mandarin through Scaffolding Strategies. E-Academia Journal, 10(2), 133-143. https://doi.org/10.24191/eaj.v10i2.12359