Challenges in Open Distance Learning (ODL): An Exploratory Study on Pandemic Era Quantity Surveying Graduates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/bej.v22i2.3851Keywords:
Open Distance Learning (ODL), Quantity Surveying (QS), Employers’ Perceptions, Graduate Employability, COVID-19Abstract
The need to maintain educational continuity during the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of Open Distance Learning (ODL). However, whether ODL can adequately prepare graduates from technical disciplines, such as Quantity Surveying (QS), for industry demands has not been verified in detail. In response, this study investigates employer perceptions of QS graduates trained through ad hoc Open Distance Learning (ODL), a mode of education widely adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objectives are to assess employers' views on the performance of these ODL graduates, evaluate the effectiveness of ODL in preparing QS graduates for employability, and identify strategies to improve the alignment of ODL implementations with employer expectations. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire survey from 71 employers in the Malaysian construction industry in Selangor and analysed using descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s alpha to assess reliability, and the Kruskal-Wallis’s test to identify differences in employer perceptions. The findings reveal mixed perceptions. While some employers appreciated the knowledge and general understanding of ODL graduates, concerns were raised regarding their technical skills, ability to meet industry demands, and proficiency in using industry-specific tools. Employers also highlighted gaps in teamwork, communication, and the overall readiness of graduates to handle real-world challenges. Scepticism remains regarding the alignment of ODL programs with practical industry needs. To address these issues, employers recommended involving industry professionals in ODL curriculum development, improving access to industry resources, and establishing stronger collaborations between academia and industry. These recommendations aim to ensure that future ODL graduates are better equipped to meet the expectations of the construction industry. This study emphasises the need for future ODL implementations to align more closely with industry demands, providing actionable insights for educators, policymakers, and stakeholders to enhance the employability and acceptance of ODL QS graduates within the construction industry.
References
Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students' perspectives. Online Submission, 2(1), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2020261309
Arias, J. J., Swinton, J., & Anderson, K. (2018). Online vs. face-to-face: A comparison of student outcomes with random assignment. E-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching, 12(2), 1-23. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1193426
Bedoya-Guerrero, A., Basantes-Andrade, A., Rosales, F. O., Naranjo-Toro, M., & León-Carlosama, R. (2024). Soft Skills and Employability of Online Graduate Students. Education Sciences, 14(8), 864. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080864
Chen, T., Peng, L., Jing, B., Wu, C., Yang, J., & Cong, G. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on user experience with online education platforms in China. Sustainability, 12(18), 7329. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187329
Falode, O. C., Ogunje, B. F., Chukwuemeka, E. J., & Bello, A. (2020). Perception and Attitude of Employers toward Distance Learning Graduates in Labor Market: A Case Study of Niger State, Nigeria. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 2021, 2(1), e02101. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/9348
Gauvreau, S., Hurst, D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Hawranik, P. (2016). Online professional skills workshops: Perspectives from distance education graduate students. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2024
Harrison, R. A., Harrison, A., Robinson, C., & Rawlings, B. (2018). The experience of international postgraduate students on a distance-learning programme. Distance Education, 39(4), 480-494. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520038
Jæger, M. M., & Blaabæk, E. H. (2020). Inequality in learning opportunities during Covid-19: Evidence from library takeout. Research in social stratification and mobility, 68, 100524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100524
Kabir, H., Hasan, M. K., & Mitra, D. K. (2021). E-learning readiness and perceived stress among the university students of Bangladesh during COVID-19: a countrywide cross-sectional study. Annals of medicine, 53(1), 2305-2314. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.2009908
Koseda, E., Cohen, I. K., Cooper, J., & McIntosh, B. (2024). Embedding employability into curriculum design: The impact of education 4.0. Policy Futures in Education, 14782103241282121. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103241282121
Mathew, V. N., & Chung, E. (2020). University Students' Perspectives on Open and Distance Learning (ODL) Implementation Amidst COVID-19. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(4), 152-160. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/AJUE/article/download/11964/5851/
Moss, S., Prosser, H., Costello, H., Simpson, N., Patel, P., Rowe, S., & Hatton, C. (1998). Reliability and validity of the PAS‐ADD Checklist for detecting psychiatric disorders in adults with intellectual disability. Journal of intellectual disability research, 42(2), 173-183. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00116.x
Obi, L. (2024). Conceptualising a model for provider-employer collaborations in quantity surveying degree apprenticeship programmes. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-11-2023-0324
Ratten, V., & Jones, P. (2021). Covid-19 and entrepreneurship education: Implications for advancing research and practice. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), 100432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100432
Rebelo, H., Christodoulou, P., Payan-Carreira, R., Dumitru, D., Mäkiö, E., Mäkiö, J., & Pnevmatikos, D. (2023). University–Business Collaboration for the Design, Development, and Delivery of Critical Thinking Blended Apprenticeships Curricula: Lessons Learned from a Three-Year Project. Education Sciences, 13(10), 1041. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101041
Richardson, J. (2018). Kruskal–Wallis test. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation (Vol. 4, pp. 937-939). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139
Soomro, K. A., Kale, U., Curtis, R., Akcaoglu, M., & Bernstein, M. (2018). Development of an instrument to measure Faculty’s information and communication technology access (FICTA). Education and information technologies, 23, 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9599-9
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in science education, 48, 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Tarmuji, I., Isa, Y. M., Daud, S. A. M. M., & Jalaludin, D. (2024). Determinants of open and distance learning (ODL) performance in higher learning institutions (HEIs): Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of ICT in Education, 11(2), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.37134/jictie.vol11.2.7.2024
Ulanday, M. L., Centeno, Z. J., Bayla, M. C., & Callanta, J. (2021). Flexible learning adaptabilities in the new normal: E-learning resources, digital meeting platforms, online learning systems and learning engagement. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 16(2). https://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/580
Viechtbauer, W., Smits, L., Kotz, D., Budé, L., Spigt, M., Serroyen, J., & Crutzen, R. (2015). A simple formula for the calculation of sample size in pilot studies. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 68(11), 1375-1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.014
Zawacki-Richter, O., & Bozkurt, A. (2023). Research trends in open, distance, and digital education. Handbook of open, distance and digital education, 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_12-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Afiq Imran Yusni, Mohd Azrai Azman, Ahmad Faiz Abd. Rashid , Noorsaidi Mahat, Nasyairi Mat Nasir , Abdul Rahimi Abdul Rahman

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International








