The Potential of Carbon Footprint Reduction of a Mid-Rise Residential Building in Sarawak

Authors

  • Nurdiyanah Yaman Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Sarawak, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia.
  • Ahmad Faiz Abd Rashid Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Sarawak, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia.

Keywords:

Carbon emission, sustainable building materials, cost implication

Abstract

Carbon emission is released into the atmosphere as the result of various activities due to rapid urbanisation and thus contributed to global warming and climate change. The government has taken various initiatives to reduce the impact, including from the construction industry in order to support the carbon footprint reduction of 40% as pledged by the Prime Minister. Various strategies, such as the Malaysian Carbon Reduction and Environmental Sustainability Tool (MyCREST), have been established to promote green building development in Malaysia. Recent studies suggested that the selection of sustainable materials can reduce the overall carbon emission of a building, but the cost has been identified as the main barriers. This paper aims to analyse the potential of carbon footprint reduction by using sustainable material in mid-rise residential building and subsequently to evaluate the cost implication. The impact of the conventional and the selected sustainable materials was assessed using data from the MyCREST tool while the data for cost analysis were taken from various sources of cost data such as JKR Rates online (RATOL), JKR Sarawak Schedule of Rates (SOR), and previous research. The results show that the sustainable materials such as 30% of Blast Furnace Slag (BFS) concrete mixture, Aerated Autoclaved Concrete (AAC) block, and recycled steel roof truss has the potential to reduce the carbon emission. The findings also show that sustainable materials are slightly cheaper than the conventional materials except for the AAC block and clay roof tiles. Therefore, the potential of carbon emission reduction approach by using MyCREST as a guideline tool can assist in the reduction of the environmental impact of buildings.

References

A. B. D. Le, A. Whyte, and W. K. Biswas, “Carbon footprint and embodied energy assessment of roof-covering materials,” Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1913–1923, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10098-018-1629-9.

A. J. Hamad, “Materials, Production, Properties and Application of Aerated Lightweight Concrete: Review,” Int. J. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2014, doi: 10.12720/ijmse.2.2.152-157.

A. N. Idris, “Public projects worth RM50m and above to adopt MyCREST — CIDB,” The Edge Markets, 2016. https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/public-projects-worth-rm50m-and-above-adopt-mycrest-—-cidb (accessed Feb. 05, 2020).

A. Vidya, K. H., and H. S. Rukiyath, “Building Construction Methodology to Reduce Global Warming,” in National Conference on Convergence of Science, Technology & Management, 2016, pp. 1–6.

B. Ali and A. Awwad, “Study of Different Pitched Roof Types Study of Different Pitched Roof Types,” no. June, 2019.

Building Research Levy, “Clay Roof Tiles. Material Use,” Level, 2015. http://www.level.org.nz/fileadmin/downloads/Materials/LevelMClayRTiles.pdf (accessed Sep. 09, 2020).

C. C. Ohueri, W. I. Enegbuma, and H. Habil, “MyCREST embedded framework for enhancing the adoption of green office building development in Sarawak,” Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 215–230, 2019, doi: 10.1108/BEPAM-10-2018-0127.

C. C. Onn, K. H. Mo, M. K. H. Radwan, W. H. Liew, C. G. Ng, and S. Yusoff, “Strength, carbon footprint and cost considerations of mortar blends with high volume ground granulated blast furnace slag,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 24, 2019, doi: 10.3390/SU11247194.

C. F. Dunant, M. P. Drewniok, M. Sansom, S. Corbey, J. M. Cullen, and J. M. Allwood, “Options to make steel reuse profitable: An analysis of cost and risk distribution across the UK construction value chain,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 183, pp. 102–111, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.141.

C. H. D. Rajeswari and B. Kameswara Rao, “Service life prediction of high-performance concrete incorporated with GGBS and silica fume,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., vol. 7, no. 6C2, pp. 448–455, 2019.

CIDB, “MyCrest,” 2020. https://www.cidb.gov.my/index.php/en/construction-info/sustainability/construction-sustainability/mycrest (accessed Nov. 10, 2020).

E. Keysar and A. R. Pearce, “Decision support tools for green building: Facilitating selection among new adopters on public sector projects,” J. Green Build., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 153–171, 2007, doi: 10.3992/jgb.2.3.153.

F. M. Saiyed, A. H. Makwana, J. Pitroda, and C. M. Vyas, “Aerated Autoclaved Concrete (Aac) Blocks: Novel Material for Construction Industry,” Int. J. Adv. Res. Eng. Sci. Manag., vol. I, no. II, pp. 21–32, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://www.google.co.in/#q=AAC+Blocks+used+at+Various+Construction+Sites+images.

F. Vats, “Autoclaved Aerated Concrete: Versatile building material,” vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 2092–2098, 2019.

G. A. Florides and P. Christodoulides, “Global warming and carbon dioxide through sciences,” Environ. Int., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 390–401, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2008.07.007.

G. K. C. Ding, “Sustainable construction--The role of environmental assessment tools,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 451–464, 2008, [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WJ7-4N0PG17-1/2/37fa80c537b89007b68d8962bd30e989.

G. Kumawat, D. S. Maru, and K. Pandey, “Cost Comparison of R.C.C. Structure using CLC blocks with Burnt Clay Bricks.,” Int. J. Adv. Res., vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 1470–1475, 2016, doi: 10.21474/ijar01/1040.

H. Al-Baijat and M. Sarireh, “The Use of Fine Blast Furnace Slag in Improvement of Properties of Concrete,” Open J. Civ. Eng., vol. 09, no. 02, pp. 95–105, 2019, doi: 10.4236/ojce.2019.92007.

I. K. Labarca, R. D. Foley, and S. M. Cramer, “Effects of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag in Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) - Expanded Study,” 2007.

I. Romanova and N. Skanavi, “The selecting of roofing material for pitched roofs by the analytic hierarchy process,” in MATEC Web of Conferences, 2017, vol. 117, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201711700147.

J. Chnebierk, “Getting it Right - Clay Roofing Tiles,” 2016. [Online]. Available: http://rehdainstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/3-Clay-Roofing-Tiles.pdf.

J. Y. Lee, J. S. Choi, T. F. Yuan, Y. S. Yoon, and D. Mitchell, “Comparing properties of concrete containing electric arc furnace slag and granulated blast furnace slag,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 9, 2019, doi: 10.3390/ma12091371.

JKR Sarawak, “SCHEDULE OF RATES 2018,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://jkr.sarawak.gov.my/modules/web/pages.php?mod=download&sub=download_show&id=96.

JKR, “Portal RATOL and Rates PreMo,” 2020. http://ratol.jkr.gov.my/ (accessed Apr. 07, 2020).

K. Kulbhushan, S. K. Verma, R. Chaudhary, S. Ahamad, S. Gupta, and S. R. Chaurasia, “A contextual analysis of the advantages by using lightweight concrete blocks as substitution of bricks,” Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 926–931, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.irjet.net/archives/V5/i2/IRJET-V5I2200.pdf.M. M. A. Klufallah, M. F. Nuruddin, M. F. Khamidi, and N. Jamaludin, “Assessment of Carbon Emission Reduction for Buildings Projects in Malaysia-A Comparative Analysis,” in E3S Web of Conferences, 2014, vol. 3, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/20140301016.

M. M. A. Klufallah, M. F. Nuruddin, M. F. Khamidi, and N. Jamaludin, “Assessment of Carbon Emission Reduction for Buildings Projects in Malaysia-A Comparative Analysis,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 3, p. 01016, 2014, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/20140301016.

P. D. Bulkade and G. P. Deshmukh, “Comparison of Analysis of Building with Conventional Bricks and AAC Blocks with Silicon Admixture,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Dev., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 21–23, 2017.

P. F. G. Banfill and A. D. Peacock, “Energy-efficient new housing - The UK reaches for sustainability,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 426–436, 2007, doi: 10.1080/09613210701339454.

Q. Roslan, S. H. Ibrahim, R. Affandi, M. N. Mohd Nawi, and A. Baharun, “A literature review on the improvement strategies of passive design for the roofing system of the modern house in a hot and humid climate region,” Front. Archit. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 126–133, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2015.10.002.

R. Johansson, “On case study methodology,” Open House Int., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 48–54, 2007.

R. Shukla, “Burnt Clay Bricks Versus Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Blocks,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 575–580, 2014.

S. I. Hong and K. Y. Ann, “Estimation of Corrosion-Free Life for Concrete Containing Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag under a Chloride-Bearing Environment,” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 2017, 2017, doi: 10.1155/2017/3186371.

S. K. Rama Jyosyula, S. Surana, and S. Raju, “Role of lightweight materials of construction on carbon dioxide emission of a reinforced concrete building,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 27, pp. 984–990, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.294.

S. Mohamed and R. Abdullah, “Timber use practices in Malaysia’s construction industry: Single-family residential building sector,” Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 475–482, 2014.

Tellis W. M., “Application of a Case Study Methodology,” Qual. Rep., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–19, 1997, [Online]. Available: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol3/iss3/1.

US Department of Interior, “The preservation and repair of historic clay tile roofs,” 1993.

W. C. Jau and D. S. Tsay, “A study of the basic engineering properties of slag cement concrete and its resistance to seawater corrosion,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1363–1371, 1998, doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00117-3.

Y. Fujita, H. Matsumoto, and H. C. Siong, “Assessment of CO2 emissions and resource sustainability for housing construction in Malaysia,” Int. J. Low-Carbon Technol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 16–26, 2009, doi: 10.1093/ijlct/ctp002.

Downloads

Published

28-08-2025

How to Cite

The Potential of Carbon Footprint Reduction of a Mid-Rise Residential Building in Sarawak. (2025). Built Environment Journal, 18(1). https://journal.uitm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/BEJ/article/view/8624

Similar Articles

1-10 of 120

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.