Improving The Practice of Real Estate E-Auction in Malaysia: An Exploratory Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/bej.v21i2.1078Keywords:
E-Lelong System High Court of Malaya, Auctioneers, Real Estate Public Auction, ImprovementsAbstract
Nowadays, internet auctions are employed instead of traditional auction procedures. This is attributed to information and computer technology advancements, e-commerce technologies, a vast catchment market, and other considerations. The online real estate auction has been used globally and in Malaysia. The High Court of Malaya now uses the E- Auction System for public real estate auctions in Malaysia. However, E- Auction practice in Malaysia has been asked to be discontinued since it interferes with the auctioneer's profession, and bidder data privacy has been compromised, potentially resulting in losses for bidders and others. This research aims to improve the current practice of real estate E- Auctions in Malaysia, with a particular emphasis on the High Court of Malaya E-Auction. Thus, the research objective to be met is to propose the improvements to the practice of real estate E-Auction in Malaysia. Meanwhile, the methodology for this research is based on primary data, which includes journal, book, conference, and seminar papers, by provides a set of questionnaires to the respondents from the public, bidders, and auctioneers themselves. The questionnaire was circulated using Google Forms, and two hundred fourteen (214) individuals participated in the survey as panel in the auction sector. The acquired data would be analysed using descriptive, crosstab, and content analysis. As a result, the research discovered a need to strengthen the auction industry, particularly the E-Auction System High Court of Malaya, in order to guarantee that the real estate auction sector remains relevant and contributes to Malaysia's economic development.
References
Ariely, D., & Simonson, I. (2003). Buying, Bidding, Playing, Or Competing? Value Assessment and Decision Dynamics in Online Auctions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 13(1), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP13-1&2_10
Beil, D. R., & Wein, L. M. (2003). An Inverse-Optimization-Based Auction Mechanism to Support a Multi- Attribute RFQ Process. Management Science 49, 1529–1545. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.11.1529.20588
Bichler, M. (2000). Decision Analysis—A Critical Enabler for Multi-Attribute Auctions. In: Proceedings of the 12th Electronic Commerce Conference, Bled, Slovenia, June 8–9, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00075-0
Bichler, M. (2001). The Future Of E-Markets: Multidimensional Market Mechanisms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492532
Bichler, M., Kaukal, M., & Segev, A. (1999). Multi-Attribute Auctions for Electronic Procurement. In: Proceedings of the First IBM IAC Workshop on Internet Based Negotiation Technologies, Yorktown Heights, NY, March 18–19.
Bichler, M., Lee, J, Lee, H. S., & Chung, J. (2001). ABSolute: An Intelligent Decision-Making Framework For E-Sourcing. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Advanced Issues of E-commerce and Web-based Information Systems, San Jose, CA, June 21–22.
Branco, F. (1997). The Design of Multidimensional Auctions. Rand Journal of Economics 28, 63–81. Retrieved from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0741-6261%2819972 ... O%3B2-D&origin=repec
Brandl, R., Andreoli, J. M., & Castellani, S. (2003). Ubiquitous Negotiation Games: A Case Study. In: Proceedings of DEXA ‘‘e-negotiations’’ Workshop, Prague, September 1–5.
Che, Y. K. (1993). Design Competition Through Multidimensional Auctions. Rand Journal of Economics 24, 668–680. Retrieved from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0741-6261%2819932 ... O%3B2- 1&origin=repec
Cosseboom, L. (2014). Everything An Outsider Needs To Know About Indonesian Ecommerce In 2014. Retrieved May 25, 2015, from https://www.techinasia.com/indonesia-ecommerce-online-shopping- 2014/
de Vries, S., & Vohra, R. (2003). Combinatorial Auctions: A Survey. INFORMS Journal of Computing 15, 284–309. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.15.3.284.16077
Dong, F., Shatz, S. M., & Xu, H. (2009). “Combating Online In-Auction Fraud: Clues, Techniques and Challenges”. Journal of Computer Science. Vol 2, pp 245-258. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2009.09.001
Edelman, B., Ostrovsky, M., & Schwarz, M. (2005). Internet Advertising and The Generalized Second- Price. Internet Advertising and The Generalized Second Price [Online]. http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/cs286r/courses/fall09/files/brinker_kung.pdf
Pinker, E. J., Seidmann, A., & Vakrat, Y. (2003). Managing Online Auctions: Current Business and Research Issues. Management Science, 49(11), 1457-1484. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.49.11.1457.20584
Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R. (1980). Auctions And Bidding Models: A Survey. Management Science, 26, 119–142 (1980). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4776310_Auctions_and_Bidding_Models_A_Survey
Gallien, J., & Wein, L. M. (2005). A Smart Market for Industrial Procurement with Capacity Constraints Management Science 51 (1), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0230
History Internet Resource (2010). Lelong [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.lelong.com.my.
In, J. (2017). Introduction Of a Pilot Study. Korean journal of anesthesiology, 70(6), 601. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.6.601
Kai, W., Eric, T. G. W., & Chi, F. T. (2002) “A Study of Online Sites in Taiwan: Product, Auction Rule, And Trading Type”. International Journal of Information Management. Vol 22, pp 127-142. July 2002.
Kambil, A., & Van Heck, E. (2002). Making Markets: How Firms Can Design and Profit from Online Auctions and Exchanges. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220505379_Book_Review_of_Making_Markets_How_Firms_Can_Design_and_Profit_from_Online_Auctions_and_Exchanges_by_Ajit_Kambil_and_Eric_van_Heck
Kersten, G., & Noronha, S. (1999). WWW-Based Negotiation Systems: Design, Implementation, And Use.
Decision Support Systems 25, 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(99)00012-3
Koppius, O., Kumar, M., & Van Heck, E. (2000). Electronic Multidimensional Auctions and The Role of Information Feedback. Paper Presented at the 8th ECIS Conference, Vienna. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221408528_Electronic_Multidimensional_Auctions_and_t he_Role_of_Information_Feedback
Lucking-Reiley, D. (1999). Using Field Experiments to Test Equivalence Between Auctions Formats: Magic on The Internet. American Economic Review 89 (5), 1063–1080. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.5.1063
Milgrom, P. (1989). Auctions and Bidding: A Primer. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.3.3.3
Mollenberg. (2004). Electronics Market System, Information Systems, Vol (4), pp 360-371, Jan 2004.
Pinker, E. J., Seidmann, A., & Vakrat, Y. (2003). Managing Online Auctions: Current Business and Research Issues. Management Science, 49(11), 1457-1484. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.49.11.1457.20584
Rothkopf, M., & Harstad, R. (1994). Modelling Competitive Bidding: A Critical Essay. Management Science 40 (3), 364–384. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.3.364
Russ, H. (2022). NegotiAuction: A Hybrid, Web-Based Auction Procedure Combining Aspects Of Negotiations And Auctions. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual Southwest Decision Sciences Institute Conference, March 15–18, 2000, San Antonio, TX. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.06.011
Strecker, S. (2003). Preference Revelation in Multi-Attribute Reverse English Auctions: A Laboratory Study. In: March, S.T., Massey, A., DeGross, J.I. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Information Systems, Seattle, pp. 271–282. Retrieved from http://www.wi-inf.uni- due.de/FGFrank/team/StefanStrecker/03CRP23.pdf
Suziraha Dzilkepli, S., Majid, M. A., & Shofian Ahmad, S. (2009). Lelongan Dalam Islam (Muzayadah): Teori Dan Aplikasi. Seminar Muamalat, Ekonomi & Kewangan Islam, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 20-21 Oktober.
Ramli, S. A. (2022). Assessing The Practice Of Real Estate E-Auction In Malaysia. Real Estate Management, School of Real Estate and Building Surveying, College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
Teich, J. E., Wallenius, H., & Wallenius, J. (1994). Advances In Negotiation Science. Transactions On Operational Research 6, 55–94.
Teich, J. E., Wallenius, H., & Wallenius, J. (1999a). Multiple Issue Auction and Market Algorithms for The World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems 26, 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167- 9236(99)00016-0
Teich, J. E., Wallenius, H., Wallenius, J., & Koppius, O.R. (2004). Emerging Multiple Issue E-Auctions.
European Journal of Operational Research 159, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.05.001
Teich, J. E., Wallenius, H., Wallenius, J., & Zaitsev, A. (1999b). A Multiple Unit Auctions Algorithm: Some Theory and A Web Implementation. Electronic Markets 9, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/101967899359111
Teich, J. E., Wallenius, H., Wallenius, J., & Zaitsev, A. (2001). Designing Electronic Auctions: An Internet- Based Hybrid Procedure Combining Aspects of Negotiations and Auctions. Journal of Electronic
Thiel, S. E. (1988). Multidimensional Auctions. Economics Letters 28, 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(88)90068-7
Wang, J. C., & Chiang, M. J. (2009). Social Interaction and Continuance Intention in Online Auctions: A Social Capital Perspective. Decision Support Systems, Vol. 47, No. 4:466-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.04.013
Zainul, N., Osman, F., & Mazlan, S. H. (2004). “E-Commerce From Islamic Perspective”. Journal Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. Vol 3, pp 280-293, Feb 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2004.01.002
Zahari, Z. (2006). Perniagaan Internet Halal Atau Haram. Majalah i. keluaran bulan October.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 06-08-2024 (2)
- 01-07-2024 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Syahmimi Ayuni Ramli, Muhammad Nazim Alias, Huraizah Arshad, Izran Sarrazin Mohammad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International
