Balancing Aesthetic and Nature: A Survey on Landscape Visual Quality and Ecosystem Function Among Garden Visitors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/bej.v22i2.1389Keywords:
Landscape visual, Ecosystem function, Scenic Beauty Estimation MethodAbstract
This study was conducted at 140 years of Penang Botanical Garden (PBG) which serves as a resource of ecosystem services and landscape visual aesthetics for visitors. This study has been undertaken to i) examine visitors’ perception on existing landscape visuals, ii) investigate visitor understanding on visual components and their function in garden’s ecosystem, iii) suggest guidelines and management strategies to balance between aesthetic and nature. The study employed structured questionnaire surveys from 330 visitors, and the instrument was adapted from Scenic Beauty Estimation Method introduced by Terry C. Daniel 1976. It is a quantitative measure of aesthetic preference for alternative wildland management system and prediction on the aesthetic consequences of alternative land uses. The data was analysed through descriptive statistical techniques. The analysis revealed that respondents highly preferred visual setting that combined with natural elements and produced sense of calm. They also have deep affection towards provisional services such as water, vegetation and air, but has limitation ability to understand the function of timber and soil towards garden’s ecosystem. It is suggested that the gap of understanding can be improved through information sharing and knowledge transfer by experts and PBG’s management through series of workshop, campaign, reading material and signage’s at the garden.
References
Castelo, S., Amado, M., Ferreira, F., & Sivaraj, M. (2024). Digital Tools in Climate Adaptation Governance in Malaysia. Plagrave Handbook of Sustainable Digitalization. Springer Link. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58795-5_12
Chen, G., & Sun, W. (2018). Plant Diversity The role of botanical gardens in scientific research, conservation, and citizen science. Plant Diversity, 40(4), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2018.07.006
Daniel, T.C. (1976). Measuring Landscape Aesthetic: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method. USDA Forest Service. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030572
Dong, S., Ma, J., Mo, Y., & Yang, H. (2022). GIS-Based Watershed Unit Forest Landscape Visual. MDPI Journal, 14 (22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214895
Jamean, E. & Abas, A. (2023). Valuation of Visitor Perception of Urban Forest Ecosystem Services in Kuala Lumpur. Land 2023, 12(3), 572. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030572
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030572
Krisantia, I., Faris, S., & Sazwani, S. (2021). Visual therapy through the application of plants and design elements in landscape. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/737/1/012008
Liu, S.; Costanza, R.; Farber, S.; Troy, A. (2010). Valuing ecosystem services. Ann. N. Y. Academic Science. Sci. 2010, 1185, 54–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05167.x
Mohamed, N., Othman, N., Hamzah, H., Zainal, M. H., & Malek, N. A. (2022). A Systematic Review of Botanical Gardens Towards Eco Restoration and Connectedness to Nature for Psychological Restoration. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1067(1-13). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1067/1/012003
Mohammad Sabri., & Ponrahono, Z. (2024). Greening the Cities: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Small Urban Parks in Promoting Urban Resilience to Climate Change. Journal of Institute of Planners. Volume 2, Issue 1 (155-165). http://dx.doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i30.1430
Mundher, R., Bakar, S. A., Maulan, S., Yusof, M. J. M., Al-Sharaa, A., Aziz, A., & Gao, H. (2022). Aesthetic Quality Assessment of Landscapes as a Model for Urban Forest Areas: A Systematic Review. Earth and Environmental Science, 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13070991
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using IBM SPS. Open University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452
Penang Green Agenda (2020). Penang Green Council. Retrieved January 15, 2024, from https://www.pgc.com.my/2020/
Tveit, M.S, Sang, A.O, Hagerhall, C.M (2018). Visual Landscape Assessment and Human Landscape Perception. Environmental Psychology: An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241072.ch5
Wartmann, F. M., Stride, C. B., Kienast, F., & Hunziker, M. (2021). Relating landscape ecological metrics with public survey data. Landscape Ecology, 36(8), 2367– 2393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01290-y
Zhu, Z., He, Q., & Zhu, X. (2022). Spatial Analysis for the Landscape Visual Aesthetic Quality of Urban Residential Districts Based on 3D City Modeling. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811500
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Noralizawati Mohamed, Nurhayati Abd Malek, Shazwan Mohamed Shaari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International
