The Relationship Between Geographical Information System (GIS) Quality and User Satisfaction, and Its Influence on Individual Work Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/jikm.v14i1.4686Keywords:
information management, software quality, geographical information system, user satisfaction, individual work performanceAbstract
The measurement of software quality has always been subjective. Many theories and models were developed to identify the contributing factors in software quality. This study focuses specifically on Geographical Information Systems (GIS) quality. The impact given by GIS enlightens decision-makers through the location element. This study focuses on the aspects of GIS quality according to the ISO-25010 software quality model. The aim of this study is to identify the level of GIS quality, user satisfaction, and individual work performance in the selected organization. It also aims to investigate the relationship between GIS quality and user satisfaction as well as examining the influence of user satisfaction on individual work performance. A total of 362 respondents have given responses to the study, where all findings were collected, reviewed, and analyzed. From the analysis, it is found that from 10 hypotheses, seven (7) are supported and three (3) are not.
References
Al-Ibbini, O.A. (2017). The Critical Success Factors Influencing the Quality of Accounting Information Systems and the Expected Performance. International journal of economics and finance, 9, 162-167.
Arevalo, M., Romero, V., Sánchez-Zhunio, C., Prado-Cabrera, D., & Cedillo, P. (2021). Towards the Evaluation of the Usability and Portability of Serious Games. IEEE 9th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH). https://doi.org/10.1109/segah52098.2021.9551903
Arshad, Y. B., bin Mohd Sani, M. S., & Binti Syed Ibrahim, S. N. (2018). Geographical Information System (GIS) as an Innovative Adoption to Ease Customers in Locating SME Business Premises in Malacca. MATEC Web of Conferences, 150, 05045. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005045
Assifa, M. R. A., Setiadi, F., & Utomo, R. G. (2023). Evaluation of Software Quality for I-Office Plus using ISO/IEC 25010 and KANO Model. JIPI (Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Informatika), 8(2), 561–571. https://doi.org/10.29100/jipi.v8i2.3561
Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Routledge.
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum.
Domingos, C., Costa, P., Santos, N. C., & Pêgo, J. M. (2022). Usability, Acceptability, and satisfaction of a wearable activity tracker in older adults: observational study in a Real-Life context in Northern Portugal. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(1), e26652. https://doi.org/10.2196/26652
Elias, J. D., & Lubua, E. W. (2021). The Impact of Usability, Functionality and Reliability on Users’ Satisfaction During Library System Adoption. The Journal of Informatics, 1(1).
Ferreira, J. M., Acuña, S. T., Dieste, O., Vegas, S., Santos, A., Rodríguez, F., & Juristo, N. (2019). Impact of usability mechanisms: an experiment on efficiency, effectiveness and user satisfaction. Information and Software Technology, 106195. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2019.106195
Gao, M., Kortum, P., & Oswald, F. (2018). Psychometric Evaluation of the USE (Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of use) Questionnaire for Reliability and Validity. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 62(1), 1414–1418. doi:10.1177/1541931218621322
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2015). Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214.
Goodhue, D., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19, 213-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249689
Gorostiaga, A., Balluerka, N., & Rodríguez-López, A. (2022). Assessment of Adaptive Performance and its Role as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Person-Organization Fit and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. PubMed, 34(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.310
Gunduz, M. E., & Das, R. (2020). Cyber-security on smart grid: Threats and potential solutions. Computer Networks, 169, 107094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2019.107094
Gupta, S., & Chug, A. (2020). Assessing Cross-Project Technique for software maintainability prediction. Procedia Computer Science, 167, 656–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.332
Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., Yee, A., & Chong, L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130
Haoues, M., Sellami, A., Ben-Abdallah, H., & Cheikhi, L. (2017). A guideline for software architecture selection based on ISO 25010 quality related characteristics. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 8, 886–909. https://doiorg.db.ub.oru.se/10.1007/s13198-016-0546-8
ISO/IEC. (2011). Systems and Software Engineering—Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE)—System and Software Quality Models. BSI Group: Geneva, Switzerland.
Jun, J., Lee, W.-J., & Jung, J. (2019). The Mediating Roles of Trust and System Quality in Achieving System Success: A System Integrator Perspective. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(2), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no2.203
Kadir, M. F. A. (2019). Task performance and adaptive performance among logistician: a conceptual perspective on the individual factors and the situational factors. International Journal of Business and Management. https://doi.org/10.26666/rmp.ijbm.2019.3.3
Kalankesh, L. R., Nasiry, Z., Fein, R., & Damanabi, S. (2020). Factors Influencing User Satisfaction with Information Systems: A Systematic Review. Galen Medical Journal, 9e1686. https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v9i0.1686
Kapo, A., Turulja, L., Zaimović, T., & Mehić, S. (2021). Examining the effect of user satisfaction and business intelligence system usage on individual job performance. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 26(2), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.30924/mjcmi.26.2.3
Kaur, A., Grover, P. S., & Dixit, A. (2018). Performance Efficiency Assessment for Software Systems. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8848-3_8
Khan, R. A., Khan, S. U., Khan, H. U., & Ilyas, M. (2022). Systematic Literature Review on Security Risks and its Practices in Secure Software Development. IEEE Access, 10, 5456–5481. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3140181
Khan, R. A., Khan, S. U., Khan, H. U., & Ilyas, M. (2021). Systematic Mapping Study on Security Approaches in Secure Software Engineering. IEEE Access, 9, 19139–19160. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3052311
Khan, M. A., Zubair, S. S., & Malik, M. (2019). An assessment of e-service quality, e-satisfaction and e-loyalty. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 8(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/sajbs-01-2019-0016
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications.
Loughlin, E. M., & Priyadarshini, A. (2021). Adaptability in the workplace: Investigating the adaptive performance job requirements for a project manager. Project Leadership and Society, 2, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2021.100012
Mahmudova, S. (2018). About Some Methods for Software Security. Transactions on Networks and Communications. https://doi.org/10.14738/tnc.72.6334
Nandini, W., Gustomo, A., & Sushandoyo, D. (2022). The Antecedents and Consequences of Individual Adaptive Performance: A Systematic Literature study. Bisnis & Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Organisasi (International Journal of Administrative Sciences & Organization), 29(2). https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v29i2.1271
Nanthaamornphong, A., & Carver, J. C. (2017). Test-Driven development in HPC Science: A case study. Computing in Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcse.2018.05329819
Nistala, P.V., Nori, K.V., & Reddy, Y. (2019). Software Quality Models: A Systematic Mapping Study. 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP), 125-134.
Peters, E., & Aggrey, G. K. (2020). An ISO 25010 Based Quality Model for ERP Systems. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 5(2), 578–583. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj050272
Rahman, M. S., Shuhidan, S. M., & Masrek, M. N. (2021). The Influence between GIS Quality and User Satisfaction towards Individual Work Performance: A Proposed Conceptual Framework. International Journal Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 11(12), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.46338/ijetae1221_17
Ramayah, T., Cheah, J., Chuah, F., Ting, H., & Memon, M. A. (2018). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0: An Updated Guide and Practical Guide to Statistical Analysis (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Saptarini, I., Rochimah, S., & Yuhana, U. L. (2017). Security Quality Measurement Framework for Academic Information System (AIS) Based on ISO/IEC 25010 Quality Model. IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series, 0(2), 128. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2017i2.2310
Sharma, Y. (2018). Application of Geographic Information System (GIS) in Education. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Scientific Research (IJAMSR), 1(1), 23–27.
Szewrański, S., Kazak, J., Sylla, M., & Świąder, M. (2016). Spatial Data Analysis with the Use of ArcGIS and Tableau Systems. In Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography (pp. 337–349). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45123-7_24
Wahyuningrum, T., & Mustofa, K. (2017). A Systematic Mapping Review of Software Quality Measurement: Research Trends, Model, and Method. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 7(5), 2847. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v7i5.pp2847-2854
Widyastuti, T., & Hidayat, R. (2018). Adaptation of Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ) into Bahasa Indonesia. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsp.2018.3020
Yang, M., Sato, S., Washizaki, H., Fukazawa, Y., & Takahashi, J. (2023). Identifying Characteristics of the Agile Development Process That Impact User Satisfaction. EASE ’23: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593434.3593470
Zhuspekova, A., & Maymurunova, A. A. (2015). Use of GIS-technologies in Kazakhstan and abroad. Research Result. Technologies of Business and Service Series, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9346-2015-1-4-24-28
Ziyae, B. (2016). Presenting an evaluation model of human resource management’s effect on corporate entrepreneurship. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12(3), 228–242.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mohd Saiful Rahman, Shamila Mohamed Shuhidan, Mohamad Noorman Masrek, Mohammad Fazli Baharuddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright of articles that appear in the journal belongs exclusively to Faculty of Information Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Publisher). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions or any other reproductions of similar nature.
